devopsy.kinsta.cloud

Tag: software development

  • Low Code: The Key to Accelerating Custom App Dev for Moderate Developers

    Low Code: The Key to Accelerating Custom App Dev for Moderate Developers

    Custom app development has become a crucial skill in an increasingly digitized world. Many moderate developers face challenges while creating unique and functional applications. This is where low-code platforms come into play, offering a solution to accelerate app development and compensate for those shortcomings.

    Who are Moderate Developers?

    While every developer is constantly evolving and growing in experience, like any professional, they can be put in three baskets. The first is entry-level developers learning on the job who may assist with debugging, essential documentation, code repository maintenance and some simple feature requests. At the other end are very experienced developers who lead projects, architect solutions, oversee the development of applications and take full ownership of delivering killer features in a new application.

    Moderate developers are those in the middle, representing a large swath of professionals with the foundational expertise to implement most app designs and feature requests. With more experience than beginners but yet to be qualified to serve as seniors on a team, they have a shared set of challenges.

    Understanding the Challenges of Moderate Developers

    Moderate developers often need help with complex application development demands and skill limitations. They are faced with creating high-quality, functional and unique applications, which can be daunting in light of the rapid pace of technological change and user expectations.

    These moderately skilled developers often face common challenges such as:
    ● Limited Expertise: Cultivating an in-depth knowledge of programming languages and development environments is an ongoing process.
    ● Time Constraints: Developing an application from scratch requires significant time. Dedicating effort to a single project can constrain developers and their organizations.
    ● Scalability Issues: Growing and expanding applications increase the need for scaling and can create complexity. Making changes and adding new features can drag down an organization’s ability to focus on new projects.
    ● Security Concerns: Moderate developers may not be aware of an application’s security risks, jeopardizing the protection of a company.

    Low-Code Platforms Offer Hope

    Low-code platforms have been created to meet the needs of moderately skilled developers and competitively focused organizations. The use of tested drag-and-drop elements offers a secure and powerful way to overcome these challenges.

    Creating practical and powerful applications is available through low-code platforms by connecting ready-made templates. This process rapidly creates applications for use as mobile and web-based applications.

    Non-IT professionals can overcome their lack of time and knowledge through low-code platforms. Short-staffed organizations in their IT department can still provide a powerful connection for their services. The team can quickly get to work meeting its primary mission.

    Visual Modeling is the Secret Power of Low-Code Platforms

    Traditional application development involves writing lines of code, testing and managing by an experienced IT staff. Low-code platforms use pre-tested and connected visual components to build and implement successful and secure applications rapidly.

    Low-code developers can see the application they are building from the beginning of the process to its launch. The drag-and-drop aspect of these platforms is more intuitive and user-friendly. Using proven templates offered by these platforms can also help reduce errors.

    Duplicating Success

    Assembling tested and ready-made components boosts the chance of an application’s success. Pre-configured applications are a way to rapidly launch applications with the confidence of a proven track record.

    Low-code platforms offer users the confidence to trust the components while looking straight at their ongoing results from a clear visual perspective. More time and attention can be paid to an application’s unique functionalities rather than the complexity and drudgery of coding.

    Team Building and Collaboration Opportunities

    The visual nature of low-code platforms allows the entire team to play an active role in an application’s development and keeps everyone speaking the same development language.

    Built-in collaboration tools facilitate feedback loops, revision tracking, user stories and messaging, making it easier for teams to work together in the same office or distributed worldwide. Everyone can own the solution while having a positive impact upon its release.

    Ensuring Scalability

    Low-code platforms offer more than a “one and done” opportunity for growth and success. Robust and friendly customer-facing connections await users of low-code platforms who take advantage of their power. They can continue to generate further service opportunities and sales after the initial launch.

    Proven internal processing networks can be extended with the same low-code platforms that started this robust development. Low-code connections can be efficiently expanded using earlier low-code work.

    Ever-changing business needs can be readily addressed with existing low-code platforms. They can continue to offer ready-made templates for internal and external successes that fit an enterprise’s needs.

    The cloud-based nature of low-code platforms ensures a flexible and continuous service of the applications. This helps ensure reliability and responsiveness to a customer’s ongoing needs.

    Choosing the Right Low-Code Platform

    Identifying the best low-code software development platform is based on several key factors that developers must consider:
    ● Ease of use
    ● Scalability
    ● Integration capabilities
    ● Ability to customize applications

    Decision-makers must also consider their team’s expertise when choosing a low-code platform. Trial versions or free tiers can be beneficial for understanding the team’s expertise and a platform’s capabilities to meet an organization’s needs.

    The Future of Low-Code Platforms

    As businesses continue to navigate the complexities of digital transformation, analysts predict a bright future for low-code platforms. The trend will be continued enterprise adoption to ensure faster development and specific business needs. It’s also clear that low-code platforms will only partially replace traditional software development. But by democratizing app development and fostering a more robust culture of innovation, low-code platforms are positioned to significantly shape the future of business in the digital era.

  • Navigating the Rise of AI-Generated Code in Software Development

    Navigating the Rise of AI-Generated Code in Software Development

    The year 2023 saw the rise of many technologies and innovations, but none quite as prominent as generative AI. Trained on vast amounts of data, these models are designed to “generate” the next sequence of values based on inputs and create novel content for various purposes. The emergence of generative AI has forced industries to rethink how they operate and where adjustments should be made. A recent study from ISG indicates that financial services are the leading industry for generative AI adoption, making up 24% of total use cases. This is followed by manufacturing at 14%, healthcare and pharma at 12% and business services at 11%.

    More recently, organizations have started contemplating generative AI’s impact on software development and its ability to effectively generate code. AI-enabled tools will have a major impact on software development, increasing the volume and velocity of code delivery and innovation. However, there are ethical and practical guardrails that need to be considered.

    Key Capabilities of Generative AI in the SDLC

    The advantage of AI tools lies in their ability to enhance the software development workflow by automating repetitive tasks. Mundane and time-consuming boilerplate code generation or routine code reviews can now be handled by the same machines that we are writing the programs for. This not only accelerates the software development lifecycle (SDLC) but liberates developers from monotonous tasks, allowing them to focus on more creative projects that require human insight.

    For developers, the strength of AI-enabled tools lies in their ability to expedite the development process. By harnessing machine learning (ML) algorithms, AI can analyze vast datasets, find patterns and generate simple code quickly, often requiring numerous iterations to get it right — hopefully! But at its core, the benefit of AI-enabled tools stems from the premise that it’s easier to refine a set of initial ideas than it is to generate them. In other words, generative AI models create the “sparks” that a good developer can turn into a full creative process.

    Challenges, Concerns and Ethical Considerations

    As the adage goes, there are two sides to every coin. While AI tools hold the power to provide immense benefits to developers, they also introduce an array of risks that cannot be overlooked:

    ● Challenges in understanding context and user requirements: Despite its sophistication, AI struggles to grasp the intricacies of specific project contexts and the diverse needs of end-users. The contextual understanding that human developers possess, gleaned from experience and intuition, is still a facet where current AI encounters hurdles.
    ● Potential security risks: The automated nature of AI-generated code introduces potential security risks that demand careful consideration. While AI algorithms strive for efficiency, they may inadvertently generate code with vulnerabilities. Addressing security concerns requires ongoing vigilance, thorough testing, and the incorporation of robust cybersecurity measures to ensure the integrity of the developed software.
    ● Adapting to evolving technological environments: The dynamic nature of technology presents another challenge for AI-generated code, as rapid changes in programming languages, frameworks and methodologies require an adaptive approach. AI models may struggle to seamlessly transition to new technological advancements, potentially causing compatibility issues and requiring continuous updates to maintain relevance.

    It’s important to note that developers will not be the only ones affected by AI’s integration into the SDLC. Security teams are barely keeping pace now, and in many organizations, they’ve become the bottleneck. Increased developer velocity will put security teams under even more pressure—the volume of scans, the range of vulnerabilities and the patches that need to be applied are all guaranteed to skyrocket.

    Automation Alone is Not Enough; We Still Need Human Developers

    While the introduction of AI marks a significant milestone in the evolution of software development, it’s essential to recognize the nuanced interplay between automation and human ability. Rather than replacing human expertise altogether, generative AI is poised to augment and complement the skills of developers. Human creativity, critical thinking and the ability to navigate complex problems will continue to be invaluable assets in the development process — true potential only appears when collaborating seamlessly with human developers, blending the efficiency of automation with the creativity and problem-solving skills inherent to human intelligence.

    Looking towards the future of software development, the trajectory of generative AI presents intriguing possibilities. It has become increasingly clear that the rise of AI-generated code is not a story of replacement but one of enhancement. While AI brings undeniable efficiency and automation to certain aspects of coding, the role of human developers is still irreplaceable. The understanding of context, the intuition required for creative problem-solving, and the adaptability to evolving technological environments are hallmarks of human expertise. These are facets that, as of now, AI struggles to replicate.

    As we embrace the future of AI-generated code, let us not forget the essence of our craft. The evolution of technology is inevitable, but it is the human touch, ingenuity and ethical foundation that will define the software landscape of tomorrow.

    Image courtesy of Josh Calabrese via Unsplash

  • Skillsoft Taps ChatGPT to Improve Developer Training

    Skillsoft Taps ChatGPT to Improve Developer Training

    Skillsoft today revealed it plans to add generative artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities to its Codecademy online training platform to provide developers with hands-on experience using ChatGPT to write code.

    Kunal Ahuja, general manager for Codecademy consumer business at Skillsoft, said the goal is to give developers a more curated path toward teaching them how to define prompts that will result in better code being generated. These enhancements will be made available to Codecademy Plus and Pro users as well as enterprise customers in the coming months, he noted.

    There’s no doubt that developers are relying more on generative AI to write code, but not all the output generated by platforms that are based on a general-purpose large language model (LLM) is going to be consistent. Codecademy provides a more immersive experience that enables developers to refine their prompt engineering expertise, said Ahuja.

    AI-enabled capabilities include code explanations and project hints to improve debugging skills, along with other real-time feedback surfaced via a virtual coding assistant. There are also courses such as “Prompt Engineering for Software Engineers” available.

    Finally, Skillsoft is also providing access to a mock interview simulator that developers can access to help determine if they are ready for a job interview.

    As it becomes more apparent that prompt engineering is a skill application development teams will need to master to build and deploy software, there’s a clear need to teach nearly everyone in IT how to craft prompts efficiently. Ultimately, the number of prompts used to generate code will have an impact on the total cost of building software.

    In the longer term, Skillsoft plans to build its own LLM using data it collects via its platform to provide training using an LLM that has been trained using code that has been curated, said Ahuja. One of the issues with a general-purpose LLM is that it is trained using examples of code pulled from across the web that varies widely in quality. That can result in outputs of code that have known vulnerabilities or that simply run inefficiently. Of course, it may be just as likely that a developer augmented by generative AI is, depending on their level of expertise, actually delivering higher-quality code.

    Despite those concerns, however, it’s still important to provide developers with the training they need today to remain competitive, said Ahuja.

    It’s not clear how much code these days is being generated by machines versus humans, but as the volume increases, the number and size of the software builds that need to be managed is only going to increase. Hopefully, as much AI will be applied to the DevOps workflows used to manage those software builds as there is being applied to writing code, but in the short term, at least, DevOps teams might soon find themselves overwhelmed.

    The one thing that is certain is DevOps teams have a vested interest in making sure the code being written by developers is of the highest quality possible. After all, whenever there is an issue with that code, it usually falls to the DevOps team to fix it.

    Image source: https://vecteezy.com/programming-background-with-person-working-with-codes-computer-e1679047506780.jpg

  • ReversingLabs Applies AI to Better Secure Application Binaries

    ReversingLabs Applies AI to Better Secure Application Binaries

    ReversingLabs this week launched a binary analysis tool that uses machine learning algorithms to identify risks before and after applications are deployed.

    Erik Thoen, vice president of product management for ReversingLabs, said Spectra Assure makes use of the same core artificial intelligence (AI) technologies the company uses to discover malware within binaries to analyze the entire software package, including first-, second- and third-party components, to identify potential threats.

    Thanks to the use of AI, Spectra Assure is able to scan applications that are gigabytes in size in minutes or hours, depending on their complexity, noted Thoen.

    That approach is critical because attacks launched against applications are more often aimed at binaries that are deployed in production applications rather than the source code used to create them, he added.

    In addition, Spectra Assure can be applied to both open source and proprietary software, said Thoen. In contrast, many legacy scanning tools are designed to only surface potential issues in open source software, he noted.

    Spectra Assure is designed to be used by both producers of software and the organizations that deploy software, said Thoen. Organizations that develop software need to be able to identify any security potential issues that may have arisen during the build process, while organizations that consume software need to be assured that there are no issues that will later compromise their IT environments, said Thoen.

    ReversingLabs is attempting to fill a gap that exists in many software supply chains between when a software build is completed and deployed, said Thoen. While developers may scan source code for vulnerabilities, it’s not uncommon for changes to be made during the build process that inadvertently create vulnerabilities, said Thoen.

    It’s still not clear which teams within organizations are assuming responsibility for the software supply chain. In many cases, DevSecOps teams are securing the software supply chain, but in other instances, cybersecurity teams have been tasked to lock them down. Among organizations that consume software, responsibility for application security might be assumed by either the cybersecurity teams or a procurement office responsible for purchasing software.

    Regardless of how software supply chain security is managed, the number of attacks against them has risen sharply. A recent ReversingLabs report found there has been a 1,300% Increase in malicious packages found in open source software platforms since 2020.

    Ultimately, it’s only a matter of time before more stringent regulations force the software supply chain security issue. A recent executive order issued by the Biden administration requiring federal agencies to secure software supply chains is a harbinger of stricter controls that enterprise IT organizations must implement. DevSecOps teams, in the meantime, have an opportunity to revisit the workflows that were created in an era where developers tended to overly trust the integrity of software components downloaded from open repositories.

    Of course, it may require a catastrophic event to truly galvanize organizations into action, but one way or another, application security is going to improve. The only issue remaining to determine is how expensive a proposition that will be given the potential fines that are likely to be one day levied.

  • Software Development in the Age of AI: How to Balance Quality and Speed

    Software Development in the Age of AI: How to Balance Quality and Speed

    There’s no mistaking the reality of AI’s influence. Across industries, businesses are calling on tech workers to make the most of this transformative technology as demand skyrockets and companies race to overcome the competition. A flagging economy only pushes expectations for AI use—in software especially. To contend with arduous workloads, 92% of developers are already using AI code generators, according to GitHub. That’s an overwhelming majority, not to mention that this usage is poised to continue generating steam.

    In light of this, we must ask ourselves a critical question: How can businesses ensure developers retain the quality of their AI-generated code? AI is a useful complement to human developers to maximize their time and allow them to focus on projects best suited to their skill sets. That said, companies have to put safeguards in place to harness the technology, not just for boosting developer productivity but also for quality outputs.

    AI Can’t Replace Human Developers

    AI code generators are a useful tool for a developer’s toolbox. Efficient, easy to use, and helpful (in a fairly rudimentary way in these early AI days), they give developers the ability to outsource some code-writing, which helps alleviate mounting demands as companies expect them to produce massive amounts of code — and fast. As most developers continue to buy into AI for productivity benefits, though, comes the responsibility to gut-check what these AI tools produce.

    There are multiple limitations and risk considerations when it comes to AI-generating code. Lack of source knowledge and context is one of them. AI pulls from what it’s taught (i.e., past data, natural language processing, machine learning), meaning it combines too many sources to trace specific pieces of coding back to one place; it’s impossible to trace the code back to a single developer or project. Security, too, becomes an issue; you can’t guarantee that what is produced is safe or clean as is. And, finally, AI doesn’t check for quality, which increases the likelihood that the code will be difficult and costly to maintain. All this ladders up to the mounting technical debt companies are already contending with.

    Developers can’t assume that any AI-generated code is of quality to be put directly into production. Human workers must review code thoroughly to ensure it meets clean code attributes–secure, reliable and maintainable. Ignoring these tenets puts businesses at risk of falling victim to the trillion-dollar cost of bad software. That said, there are still undeniable benefits to using AI in a coding environment that make it an invaluable tool for any company that wants to stay at the top of their software game.

    Working Responsibly With AI in Software Development

    Despite its potential shortcomings, when used safely and effectively alongside a clean code solution, AI brings a tremendous opportunity to the software space that has already made it a key tool for developers as their workloads and demands mount. For one, AI has the incredible ability to churn out code at a speed that far outpaces its human counterparts. This tech can complete tedious work that may take valuable time out of a developer’s day in a matter of seconds. AI can not only move a project forward at a faster rate, but its quick coding capabilities can also give developers a jump start on their projects and help them figure out where to begin.

    While the source of AI’s knowledge base can present a challenge, the vastness of that knowledge is a benefit. As long as a developer can input their preferred language and their specific needs, AI can share the best approach to solving a problem. Its algorithmic assistance can help lead a developer through parts of their projects step by step. This also alleviates the burden of research from developers, who can spend less time checking for accuracy than they would trying to understand different programming concepts or code snippets outside their area of expertise. AI can also handle the slog of documentation, which can not only bring clarity to what didn’t work during the development process but reduce time to delivery overall.

    Developers who don’t harness AI do so at the risk of falling behind the competition as this tech becomes such a vital piece of everyday work in software. But there’s no mistaking the fact that to best incorporate AI, developers still need to ensure its accuracy before any code generated by AI makes it to production.

    GenAI Requires Automated Tools as Safeguards

    As I previously said, developers can’t assume that any AI-generated code is clean and fit for production. That means human skills are still required to check the output. However, this kind of work can often fall to developers or DevOps, and having human workers check code on their own creates an incredible workload that can even negate the use of AI in the first place.

    The best way for companies to mitigate this and mitigate technical debt is to implement automation in the part of the process that scans and monitors AI-generated code. But that can’t be done without developer buy-in. Those creating the software are the people who will best understand the development process as they work through it day in and day out, so their input is required to make the most out of automation.

    There are developer tools that can handle this kind of work while still including developers in the process. For example, introducing code-scanning into the CI/CD process can not only help continuously monitor AI-generated code for bugs and issues, allowing developers to focus on other more challenging aspects of their projects, but it also gives them insight into errors and allows for speedier resolutions. These tools aren’t necessarily new to development, but their ability to identify bugs can help developers prioritize other aspects of the process, particularly as the amount of code reaches exponential levels compared to decades ago with the introduction of GenAI.

    Static application security testing (SAST) also allows for the identification of security vulnerabilities that can potentially arise from AI-generated code. This is critical in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) so developers can spot vulnerabilities before the code goes into production. AI-generated code is only as strong or secure as that source, and since it’s not entirely possible to verify, developers need to take every precaution available to avoid security issues that rack up costs in the long term.

    The vital part of using these tools is ensuring they’re integrated into the process in a way that makes sense for developers rather than creating additional work and headaches with a cumbersome process that doesn’t fit the way teams think and work. But, the need to check AI-generated code shouldn’t be underestimated. Developers can’t simply trust what they’re given. By including a level of automation within the development process—and doing so early and often—developers are in a position to produce better-quality, more secure software to push a business forward.

    Effective Adoption of AI Will Encourage Business Growth

    While it’s difficult to predict exactly where AI will take us in the years to come, it’s equally undeniable that it will play a critical part in the future of software development. Yes, AI is already helping to streamline processes and letting developers prioritize the tasks that best take advantage of their skills. But, as noted above, that doesn’t mean the code output is entirely safe, secure or accurate. Developers still need a level of automation to deliver code that best takes advantage of AI while keeping their workload manageable and their focus on other parts of the development process.

    With the right guardrails in place, developers can guide AI to create the kind of clean, secure, and reliable code that aids businesses rather than create costly problems for them, both now and down the line. Human skills, with a boost from AI, plus code scanning safeguards, give organizations the winning combination to put themselves in the best possible place to succeed in a rapid, fierce competitive landscape of digital business.

  • Legit Security Adds Sensors to Detect Usage of Gen AI Tools to Write Code

    Legit Security Adds Sensors to Detect Usage of Gen AI Tools to Write Code

    Legit Security today announced it has added the ability to detect when developers use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to write code to its application security posture management (ASPM) platform.

    The ASPM platform developed by Legit Security already has discovery capabilities for application secrets, for example, enabled by sensors that are now being extended to include generative AI tools.

    Legit Security CTO Liav Caspi said the overall goal is to allow DevSecOps teams to identify who uses these tools to write which types of code. Each DevSecOps team can then decide how stringently to enforce policies to either ban or limit usage of those tools, he added.

    There is no doubt that generative AI tools are increasing developer productivity, but the large language models (LLMs) that provide the ability to generate code were trained using examples of code of varying quality collected from across the web. Much of that code either contains known vulnerabilities or is simply inefficient, which can manifest itself in the output surfaced by a generative AI platform.

    The Legit Security ASPM platform, in addition to identifying generative AI tools being used in real-time, can also be employed to scan the LLM itself to identify security risks such as prompt injection and insecure output handling. Unfortunately, most cybersecurity teams are unaware of the extent to which application code generated by a machine might be insecure, so it currently falls to leaders of DevSecOps teams to determine what is an acceptable use of these tools. It may be perfectly fine to rely on a generative AI tool to create a script that will be used for an internal-facing application. However, using the same tool to write business logic that will be exposed to the internet may not be especially prudent.

    It’s not clear how much of the code finding its way into software builds is being generated by a machine versus a human. In the longer term, the goal is to be able to identify that code by, for example, detecting substantial changes in the way code is normally written by a human developer, said Caspi.

    Of course, while an ASPM may detect usage of generative AI tools that are connected to a corporate environment, there are still plenty of opportunities for developers to use these tools offline to create code that can later be added to a build using a code check-in tool. After all, many developers have used various shadow IT tools to write code for decades. Regardless of who or what wrote that code, however, it should still be reviewed.

    In the meantime, the overall size of the codebase that DevSecOps teams will need to manage and secure will only exponentially increase as developers become more productive. Hopefully, more AI capabilities will soon be embedded into DevOps platforms to further automate the management of software builds at a time when many DevOps teams were already finding themselves overwhelmed even prior to the rise of generative AI.