Welcome to The Long View—where we peruse the news of the week and strip it to the essentials. Let’s work out what really matters.
This week: Don’t get scammed looking for a job, and momentum grows for the 32-hour working week. (more…)

Welcome to The Long View—where we peruse the news of the week and strip it to the essentials. Let’s work out what really matters.
This week: Don’t get scammed looking for a job, and momentum grows for the 32-hour working week. (more…)

Well over one-third (37%) of respondents to a recent industry survey reported that recruiting developers with the needed skills would continue to be a challenge through 2023. More than 2,000 developers and IT professionals participated in the Infragistics survey from December 2022 to January 2023.
The survey also found developers and IT professionals are just as concerned (37%) when it comes to their organization’s ability to keep employees safe. The survey also found respondents believed they are working with limited resources (36%).
“Over the past three years, workers have been faced with a series of unexpected challenges—the COVID-19 pandemic, an economic downturn and a volatile work environment–which is pushing employers to do more to assure workers are protected. Employers that take steps to protect their employees will be more likely to retain them, especially in light of the developer shortage,” the report said.
The three technical jobs survey respondents said were the most difficult to recruit are DevOps engineers (16%), data analytics developers (16%) and IT security engineers (13%).
The report found that while nearly all developers (89%) worked with a designer or design team, less than half of a developer’s time (43%) is spent on actual application coding. In most cases, low-code/no-code tools are filling in gaps left by vacant roles and helping organizations keep up with the necessary pace of development. “The lack of skilled developers challenge is being solved by the use of low-code/no-code tools in [more than] three-quarters (77%) of organizations,” the report said.
Looking ahead, the survey found that software developers planned to improve project management (30%), improve designer/developer collaboration (30%), use software that will work for citizen developers (27%), use remote staff (25%) and incorporate a data catalog/analytics catalog (25%).
“The biggest software development challenges in 2023 will be the inability to keep pace with innovation in developer tools (28%), difficulty with third-party integration (267%), struggle to manage workload (26%), security threats (26%), project management (26%) and client expectations that are too high (26%),” the report said.
Despite the rough patch that rattled the industry throughout the second half of 2022, the survey results indicated developers are optimistic for the rest of this year. According to the survey, the software development industry plans to:
Finally, the survey found business intelligence and embedded analytics are increasing in usage. More than 80% of developers currently incorporated these tools into their products, up 3% from the previous year’s survey.
Embedded analytics in apps is also on the rise. Almost half, or “48% of developers were embedding analytics into client apps in 2022, compared to 31% in 2021. And 75% of software developers expected their organization’s focus on business intelligence to increase in 2023,” the report stated.
The top three reasons software developers incorporate embedded analytics: Improving customer satisfaction (32%), gaining a competitive advantage (30%) and making data-driven decisions (25%).
According to the report, customers included embedded analytics in their requirements in the hope they would improve productivity (42%), increase sales/revenue (39%), understand business problems (33%) and make better business decisions (32%).

An analysis of more than 494,000 interview requests for software engineers coupled with a survey of more than 1,300 software engineers and 120 hiring professionals found a lot more employers prefer to hire DevOps professionals who work in the office—but resistance to working in an office (rather than working remotely) remains high.
The survey also found that, despite the preference for hiring local software engineers, more than half of hiring professionals (52%) are filling positions on fully remote teams while another 40% are focusing on hybrid teams.
The interview requests analysis conducted by Hired, a provider of a platform for vetting potential employees, found that nearly three-quarters of interview requests (72%) were for software engineers with more than six years of experience. Backend engineers received 59% of all interview requests.
Hired CEO Josh Brenner said the survey makes it clear that organizations are less inclined to hire less experienced talent. In fact, there’s a decided shift toward DevOps professionals that have degrees versus individuals that are largely self-taught, he added.
Hiring those individuals, however, remains challenging. More of them are willing to consider other employment options given the current state of the economy, but more than two-thirds of engineers (68%) said they are not worried about losing their jobs in the next six months.
However, enterprise IT organizations are now finding it easier to hire DevOps engineers because competition from startup companies and technology vendors such as Google and Microsoft slackened in the wake of a series of ongoing layoffs, noted Brenner.
Competition for software engineers is also impacted by geographic region, with the Los Angeles area seeing the largest negative impact on local salaries, decreasing by 6% to $152,000. Philadelphia had the greatest amount of growth, with local salaries increasing by 7% to $150,000. Despite demand for remote engineering talent, growth in salaries for these positions has flattened. The San Francisco Bay Area had the highest salaries for remote roles at $180,000, followed by Seattle ($175,000) and New York ($169,000). The percentage of active engineering positions “open to remote” fell to 69%, the survey found.
The highest-paying markets for in-office jobs, in contrast, were San Francisco ($180,000), Seattle ($169,000) and New York ($162,000).
Software engineers, as always, are motivated to work for organizations based on new challenges and continuous learning (69%), building products/solutions and problem-solving (66%) followed by earning potential and career stability (60%), the survey found. When learning a new skill, the survey found the biggest motivator remained the simple joy of learning new things (40%) followed by the fact that their current job required it (25%).
Regardless of the state of the economy, it’s clear that demand for DevOps expertise continues to outstrip available supply. However, software engineers may be unable to command as high a salary as they did a short while ago. Of course, no one can be sure what lies ahead, but economies do eventually rebound. In the meantime, DevOps professionals would be well-advised to continue to invest in their own skills to maximize their earning potential, no matter which direction the economic pendulum swings.

Developer experience (DX) has become essential to modern enterprise software development. As more companies become software companies, more are opening up their software both for internal reuse and externalized consumption. As part of this process, making developer-facing tools consumable and friction-free becomes more necessary to both perform well and stand out in the market.
To oversee developer experience quality within an organization, an entire new role is beginning to emerge — the chief developer experience officer (CDXO). A CDXO is in charge of ensuring the intuitiveness of developer-facing toolsets and being an advocate for engineering needs. Such a focus could improve internal platform usability, like within platform engineering initiatives. Or, it may involve improving the developer experience for public or partner APIs through quality documentation, SDKs, libraries, forums, tutorials and more. A CDXO might interface with many departments to monitor and improve DX across the organization.
Since the role is in its very early stages, few CDXOs exist. But I tracked down a few to gather insights on the emerging position—I had the unique opportunity to sync with Alessandro Cauduro, chief developer experience officer at Azion and Ivan Burazin, chief developer experience officer at Infobip. They both shared some fantastic insights on why DX is so important these days and what qualities make a good developer experience leader. Below, I’ll distill their wisdom and take a peek into the life of a CDXO.
First, it’s good to reiterate that developer experience is increasingly important for several reasons. Organizations want to build and ship applications faster and more securely. Yet, it can be difficult for programmers to keep up with new technology trends. “Technology is always changing, and developers are always having to try new things,” said Cauduro. “As a result, you rarely become an expert on a single platform.”
Developer experience helps you get up and running quickly with new tools. The mindset is similar to user experience (UX) but more applicable to different interaction points like APIs, CLIs, SDKs, VSCode plugins, libraries or other developer-facing technologies. Improving usability for these packages helps ease the daily grind, increases productivity and can be a competitive advantage, said Cauduro. He added that a benchmark of great developer experience is when you don’t even have to read the documentation to understand what you have to do.
“I think that developers are the lifeblood of innovation,” said Burazin. “They are the ones creating solutions and implementing transformative technologies. Yet, they are often let down when it comes to the tools they use to achieve this innovation, so providing a great developer experience is paramount if we want to foster that innovation as much as possible.”
So, what does a day in the life of a CDXO officer look like? What are some of their roles and responsibilities? According to Cauduro, the overarching goal is to put himself in the developer’s shoes—he constantly thinks about common developer workflows and considers how to create a seamless experience throughout the entire development life cycle.
Next is spreading awareness throughout the company about DX principles and how to increase DX within their offerings. A CDXO will likely answer directly to executive leadership but might interface with many departments. A CDXO may direct teams to construct developer-specific tools, like libraries, documentation, SDKs and self-service environments. “DX is a mindset,” said Cauduro. “The whole company needs to be engaged in it.”
“As with any C-level position, your job is on the one hand to make your team’s life easier in any way you can,” said Burazin. “And on the other to convey the developers’ issues or ideas to the company in hopes of nudging the company in the correct direction.”
A CDXO may also oversee developer relations efforts, which focus on fostering a developer community. There are many ways to interface with partners and clients to exchange ideas on how to build against the platform, Cauduro explained. This includes promoting open source projects, encouraging user meetings or interacting on Discord and forums to provide answers to community questions.
The CDXO position isn’t for everyone. So, what personality traits make a good candidate for the role? Here are some of the necessary qualifications for the type of work:
At Azion, Cauduro is interested in how its tools can help developers move solutions from the cloud to the edge more seamlessly. To that end, they’ve found that Jamstack fits well with the needs of edge computing. Thus, some of his efforts focus on making the process of deploying a Jamstack app to the edge as seamless as possible for engineers.
While DX efforts have helped address development bottlenecks at Azion, the role of CDXO may not be necessary within all companies, admitted Cauduro. It’s more of a fit for API-first or SaaS companies that target developers as a primary consumer base. That being said, other companies can still benefit from a developer experience focus to enhance their internal IT platforms.
At InfoBip, Burazin explained that developer experience efforts center around helping external developers consume the InfoBip API, an API for all communication channels, such as SMS, voice, WebRTC and more. Sitting under the CTO, Burazin helps run three teams and DX has its own department. Impressively, he reports revenue on self-service APIs has increased fivefold in the past two years.
Burazin, also the co-founder of Codeanywhere, explained that his role is to “convey the worries or needs of the developer customers to management and help steer the ship in the right direction.” To discover those needs, he recommends ‘dogfooding’ what the customer is experiencing and streamlining the onboarding process to be as self-service as possible. He also recommends having measurable insights on metrics you can directly impact, like decreasing time from discovery to ‘hello world.’
Developer experience is becoming a unique selling point for technology companies—so much so that it’s entered the C-suite. “Whoever has the better DX will have the leading edge,” said Cauduro. For him, it’s about finding small things to optimize that remove pain points from the developer’s process.
To summarize, the role of CDXO is still evolving and not set in stone. And, granted, many different labels are being applied to describe similar objectives. But to get an idea of what the CDXO role entails, some common activities include:
Looking to the future, developer experience will likely become more of a necessity as developer-driven purchasing habits become a real revenue driver. “This bottom-up go-to-market motion will help awareness and increase sales,” said Burazin. And, to helm this movement, more companies may adopt DX within a C-suite title. But of course, the role may look different from company to company as DX is applied in different ways.
“If we look at the largest technology companies, almost all of them have a developer experience department in their organization. And this is due to the fact that so much of a developer’s productivity is directly linked to their experience while working,” said Burazin. Things like internal developer portals and standard cloud deployments will help improve developer experience and help them focus on what they do best, which is coding, he said.

DevOps.com is now providing a weekly DevOps jobs report through which opportunities for DevOps professionals will be highlighted as part of an effort to better serve our audience.
Our goal in these challenging economic times is to make it easier for DevOps professionals to advance their careers. Of course, the pool of available DevOps talent is still relatively constrained, so when one DevOps professional takes on a new role, it creates an opportunity for others.
The five job postings shared this week are selected based on the company looking to hire, the vertical industry segment and, naturally, the pay scale offered.
We’re also committed to providing additional insights into the state of the DevOps job market. In the meantime, for your consideration:
Monster.com
LongTail Ad Solutions
New York, New York
Senior DevOps Engineer
$170,000
TuneIn
New York, New York
Staff Infrastructure Automation Engineer
$166,000 to $249,500
SimplyHired
The Hartford
Remote
Senior Staff Software Engineer
$123,120 to $184,680
Indeed.com
Volunteer Corporate Credit Union
Nashville, Tennessee
Senior DevOps Engineer
$109,000 to $139,000
Dice.com
MRoads
Phoenix, Arizona
DevOps Engineer- Associate
$100,000 to $120,000

Welcome to The Long View—where we peruse the news of the week and strip it to the essentials. Let’s work out what really matters.
This week: Working from home is here to stay, and Agile is still a failure. (more…)

Platform engineering helps centralize the responsibilities associated with maintaining internal infrastructure. And it continues to be an emerging discipline—according to the 2023 State of DevOps Report, 51% of organizations have already adopted platform engineering within the last three years, and 93% said it’s a step in the right direction.
I recently met with Hope Lynch, senior director of platform at Cloudbees, to gain some insights on implementing platform engineering. According to Lynch, platform engineering has emerged at a critical juncture. Developers are overloaded, burnout is on the rise and tooling sprawl is starting to rear its ugly head. To respond to these trends, platform engineering has emerged to take the heavy load off internal software infrastructure management. But the practice requires keenly balancing responsibility with control and treating the platform as a product.
Interestingly, Lynch believes that many IT departments—whether they know it or not—are already implementing some form of platform engineering. They might just need to work out the kinks. Below, we’ll define platform engineering as it relates to DevOps and share some best practices to consider when rolling out (or reiterating) a platform engineering plan within your organization.
So, what is the state of platform engineering and DevOps? Contrary to the salacious ‘DevOps is dead,’ headlines, Lynch doesn’t believe DevOps is going anywhere. Instead, platform engineering is helping overburdened developers, having emerged at a time when developers and operations seem to be at a crossroads.
Developers are now responsible for coding, security, deployment and infrastructure maintenance. “Developers are talented and creative, but everyone has only so much capacity,” said Lynch. She believes platform teams can relieve some of these pressures by creating standard builds and common CI/CD pipelines. “I see it as a partnership between the DevOps teams and platform operations teams.”
Lynch views DevOps as more of a practice than a specific job title. And although developers should have control over their DevOps toolchain, she believes they were granted too much responsibility. For example, the amount of effort required to search the market, talk to vendors, and try out tools can all add up significantly.
By creating proven patterns and managing tools, platform engineering teams can help narrow down the options, working behind the scenes to ensure the platform is self-serviceable and continually updated. Of course, this partnership requires regularly collecting feedback to ensure platform teams are enhancing development workflows, not hindering them.
So, what are some best practices that enterprises can apply to their internal DevOps platforms? Lynch shared some areas platform engineering teams should focus on to improve their process. By following these tips, a platform can enhance DevOps principles within a company.
For any new initiative to be successful, it must have goalposts and be measured in some capacity. The same is true for platform engineering. So, what are some goalposts that IT leaders should have in mind when introducing platform engineering? According to Lynch, some positive end results include collaboration and efficiency, cost analysis, cybersecurity and tooling centralization.
“Platform engineering, when done right, furthers the principles of DevOps,” said Lynch. And interestingly, it may be the case that teams don’t even realize they are already doing platform engineering. Once they realize they are gravitating toward these ideals, it will be an even greater reinforcer for DevOps and DevOps principles, she said.
Currently, the tech space is in a tricky spot, with rising layoffs and tightening budgets. At many organizations, fewer people are now expected to perform the same high caliber of work. As a result, we need to place more emphasis on retaining the remaining talent and boosting morale. This means caring about what the developer’s experience is like throughout the day and supporting the human side of DevOps. According to Lynch, platform engineering is a natural choice in these circumstances.

This article is part three of three on the boom in platform engineering and its role in supporting a streamlined, positive developer experience.
In a perfect world, the developer experience would be on that is completely free of obstacles. In the previous articles in this series, I argued that supporting and improving the developer experience is a critical business requirement. To continuously improve and keep up with the constant change that typifies the cloud-native development landscape, platform engineering is–at least for now–the golden path to reducing developer toil and increasing productivity.
I’ve also countered the controversial idea that DevOps is on life support because centralized developer platforms eliminate the need for DevOps. If anything, DevOps and developers share a symbiotic relationship, and the developer platform is where their functions converge. In this third and final article of the series, I will explore this relationship, examining the considerations for how the developer experience is “platformed” and by whom.
Let’s put it this way: The more relevant and useful the developer platform, the likelier the developer is to use it. If it reduces toil, cognitive load and makes shipping software easier, the developer has more time to focus on their core task: Developing features. With intuitive, self-service workflows and all the tools developers need, they rarely, if ever, have to think about ‘the how’ of getting their software into the hands of users. And this works if and when an organization does at least a couple of things right:
Does this mean the “optimal experience” can’t be optimized? Does that mean developers cannot have input into their own (or more general) developer experience(s)? No. In fact, part of what makes the developer platform idea compelling is that developers don’t have to weigh in or make decisions on the platform or tooling. Still, it’s possible to let them have that freedom if the team or organization wants to. Bottom line: There is no one-size-fits-all developer platform any more than there is a single developer experience. This is why DevOps, along with PlatformOps, is an ideal complement to facilitating the “circular economy” of the developer platform. The platform is unlikely to stay static. And to keep it dynamic and responsive to the changing needs of the developer teams using it, the DevOps teams of the future can proactively remove, recycle, repurpose and restructure the way the platform runs and what tools are available in it, automating and evaluating … almost like a feedback loop on the platform itself.
The developer experience is built around the tools and workflows developers use and, in the case of a developer platform, the tools and processes you define and provide, i.e., a “golden path” to productivity.
Whatever that platform includes, it will demand that you answer questions about what tools, processes and best practices will be most effective for delivering the optimal developer experience. For example, what and how much should you build yourself? How should the platform be assembled to best serve the needs of your developer team? What is the most effective configuration? How much freedom can or should be given to your developers, depending on your business goals and the security, stability and scalability requirements of your organization and products?
Boiling down the route to the golden path, there are three critical points to help guide the creation of an effective internal developer platform:
Developer platforms can significantly improve developer productivity and the overall developer experience. But you can’t just build a platform and hope for the best without seeking developer input or understanding how developers work. Nor can you build a platform and decide it’s finished and forget about maintenance, enhancements and inevitable change. Developer platforms don’t exist as one-and-done items on a checklist and are themselves productivity tools that are in a constant state of flux.
Misunderstanding why you would platform the developer experience in the first place defeats the purpose.

DevOps.com is now providing a weekly DevOps jobs report through which opportunities for DevOps professionals will be highlighted as part of an effort to better serve our audience.
Our goal in these challenging economic times is to make it easier for DevOps professionals to advance their careers. Of course, the pool of available DevOps talent is still relatively constrained, so when one DevOps professional takes on a new role, it creates an opportunity for others.
The five job postings shared this week are selected based on the company looking to hire, the vertical industry segment and, naturally, the pay scale offered.
We’re also committed to providing additional insights into the state of the DevOps job market. In the meantime, for your consideration:
Dice.com
Pyramid Systems
Remote
AWS Cloud DevOps Platform Engineer
$160,000 to $200,000
Monster.com
Apidel Technologies
Los Angeles, California
Software engineer
$140,000 to $160,000
SimplyHired
Cox Communications
Atlanta, Georgia
Senior DevSecOps Cybersecurity Architect
$120,000 to $150,000
EdgeLink
Beaverton, Oregon
DevOps Engineer
$110,000 to $120,000
Indeed.com
CrowdStrike
Remote
DevOps engineer
$105,000 to $195,000

Welcome to The Long View—where we peruse the news of the week and strip it to the essentials. Let’s work out what really matters.
This week: Denis Pushkarev is fed up with core-js freeloaders, and hundreds more malicious packages found at PyPI. (more…)