Author: Alan Shimel

  • DOES London 2019: Give Repos the Respect They Deserve

    DOES London 2019: Give Repos the Respect They Deserve

    Think about it. could we have a DevOps or even agile without code repositories (repos)? Repos allow for version control, team collaboration, testing on check in and more. So much of what we do today around software development and DevOps is based on the repo.

    For a long time and even today, the repo was sort of the Rodney Dangerfield of software tools. In spite of how important it is, it didn’t get the respect it deserved. Of course that changed a bit when Microsoft laid out all those billions of dollars for GitHub. But even then, the narrative was Microsoft paid that much to reach all those millions of developers that used GitHub. Not for all of the great features and functionality GitHub delivered to its million users.

    Also, in the case of GitHub, they had done a masterful job of weaving together a fantastic free, open source tool with enterprise features and SaaS delivery models to build a legitimate business for everyone from single developers to small groups and all the way up to large enterprises.

    Nigel Abbott, GitHub

    In this interview from the Digital Anarchist news room at DevOps Enterprise Summit London, 2019 we spoke with Nigel Abbott, director at GitHub for EMEA. After leading GitHub’s efforts for the enterprise in the UK, Nigel is now leading enterprise efforts for all of Northern Europe.

    This was a great interview with Nigel and hope you will enjoy it, too.

    Nigel Abbott, GitHub | DOES London 2019

    Don’t forget! DevOps Enterprise Summit Las Vegas 2019 is happening from October 28-30 at The Cosmopolitan Hotel. Be sure to register here if you haven’t already and join us for a premier event for the technology leaders of large, complex organizations implementing DevOps principles and practices. You can also preview the event by watching presentations from past DevOps Enterprise Summits.

    — Alan Shimel

  • DOES 2019: Understanding the Effects of Burnout

    DOES 2019: Understanding the Effects of Burnout

    If you work in the IT field, cybersecurity, the startup world or any other high-pressure job, you or someone you know has probably suffered from burnout in one form or another. If so, you already know that burnout is a real condition with significant consequences. In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently recognized burnout as an occupational phenomenon.

    The WHO describes burnout as follows:

    Burn-out (sic) is a syndrome conceptualized as resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed. It is characterized by three dimensions:

      • feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion;
      • increased mental distance from one’s job, or feelings of negativism or cynicism related to one’s job; and
      • reduced professional efficacy.

    I have been on the road pretty much constantly for the last three or four months (no, I am not trying to say I suffer from burnout). We have covered lots of great conferences. One of the best, as usual, was Gene Kim’s DevOps Enterprise Summit in London. We have about 30 videos from the conference up on the Digital Anarchist site. Of those interviews, my favorite is the one in which I had a chance to sit down with three PhDs to discuss the issue of burnout. I say three PhDs not just to throw around titles—these are three recognized experts in their field.

    The trio of panelists are:

    Dr. Christina Maslach — Probably the foremost authority in the world on burnout.

    Dr. Steven Spear — Senior Lecturer at MIT Sloan School and the Engineering Systems Division at MIT.

    Dr. Nicole Forsgren — Founder of DevOps Research and Assessment, now part of Google.

    This interview is a little bit longer than most, slightly more than 30 minutes. But I think it is well worth your time to hear what these three experts have to say on the issue of burnout and workplace fatigue.

    In addition to our interview on the Digital Anarchist set, I am also happy to include the panel discussion these three folks had on the main stage of DOES London with Gene Kim.

    More importantly, if you or someone you know is suffering from burnout symptoms, please reach out for help and do something about it. You are not alone.

    Don’t forget! DevOps Enterprise Summit Las Vegas 2019 is happening Oct. 28-30 at The Cosmopolitan Hotel. Be sure to register here if you haven’t already and join us for the premier event for technology leaders of large, complex organizations implementing DevOps principles and practices. You can also preview the event by watching presentations from past DevOps Enterprise Summits.

    — Alan Shimel

  • DevOps Chat: Armory Discusses $28M Funding, Continuous Delivery

    DevOps Chat: Armory Discusses $28M Funding, Continuous Delivery

    The tribe at Armory announced the company‘s $28m series B funding, led by Insight Partners. Armory enables continuous software delivery at enterprise scale, powered by Spinnaker.

    That is a crisp mission statement, but beyond that Armory is bringing the open source Spinnaker to the enterprise market. As such, they are also helping the entire Spinnaker community and as part of this the entire CD market. They are members of the CD Foundation and part of the Linux Foundation as well.

    In this DevOps Chat, I had a chance to catch up with Armory’s founder/CEO, DROdio and VP of marketing, Carl Landers to talk about Spinnaker, CD and the state of software delivery.

    BTW, if you are interested in learning more about Spinnaker and will be in San Diego for CloudNative.com/KubeCon, the Spinnaker Summit is the weekend before. The Armory folks have been nice enough to arrange a 20% discount if you would like to go:
    www.eventbrite.com/e/spinnaker-sum…=ARMORYAUGUST20. The code for discount is ARMORYAUGUST20.

    Also, you can join the Spinnaker Slack channel at: join.Spinnaker.io

    As usual, the streaming audio is immediately below, followed by the transcript of our conversation.

    Transcript

    Alan Shimel: Hey, everyone, it’s Alan Shimel, devopsy.kinsta.cloud, and you’re listening to another DevOps Chat. We’ve got some exciting funding news on today’s DevOps Chat. A company I’ve been familiar with now for a few months, Armory, Armory.io—is it Online Networks, DROdio, or just Armory?

    DROdio: Just Armory.

    Shimel: Armory. And—well, they let that cat out of the bag. I’ve got with me the Armory CEO and Founder, DROdio. DROdio, welcome.

    DROdio: Great to be here. Thank you, Alan.

    Shimel: And some people, if you’re wondering out there, when I first met DROdio, he told me it’s like rodeo with a D, so if you’re wondering how to say it, that’s how you say it. But DROdio, just for the record, give our listeners your real name, your full name.

    DROdio: Yeah, so, my full name is Daniel Rubén Odio, and I go by DROdio. It’s my handle on everything, so DROdio is easy.

    Shimel: Okay. And then joining DROdio and myself today is—well, DROdio, why don’t you introduce Carl?

    DROdio: Sure. I’m very happy to welcome Carl to Armory. Carl has recently joined us, our VP of Marketing. Carl, I’ll let you introduce yourself.

    Carl Landers: Welcome to everyone who’s listening. This is Carl Landers, and I’m happy to join you, and I’ve been with DROdio at Armory for a couple of months, and we are excited to share news today about what’s happening with Spinnaker and with Armory. Alan, it’s great to be here.

    Shimel: Thanks, Carl. Hey, and it’s a pleasure to have you here. So, we’re gonna jump into Spinnaker and Armory and go a little bit more in depth in that in a moment, but let’s take care of the news first. The big news is, you’ve announced a series B of $28,000,000.00, and it’s led by Insight Partners, correct?

    DROdio: That is correct. Very happy to have Insight joining our board. Insight has seized the same opportunity that we do, which is that there is a large category forming in software delivery that could never be a category before, and we can talk a little bit about why that’s changing, but Lonne Jaffe is gonna be joining our board as the newest board members, and I just—I couldn’t be more thrilled about having Insight involved and funding Armory’s growth.

    Shimel: Well, and again, let me just fill in with a little background. For those who may not be familiar with Insight Partners, I think the number is something outrageous, $25,000,000,000.00 under management or something like that. And they are the folks who have really financed a ton of, or a bunch of really blue chip companies in the DevOps space, including companies like JFrog and Tricentis and now Armory, and more than several others, really doing a nice job there.

    Lonne Jaffe from Insight is joining the board, you mentioned, DROdio. Any just—I mean, do you know his background that you can share? What does he bring?

    DROdio: Yeah, so, Lonne is an especially good board member for us, because Lonne has a deep background in AI and ML and really understands that space well. And Alan, I’m sure that you know this and probably the people listening also understand it—software delivery is, especially into the cloud, is just in the first innings of a very long game. So, really, a lot of what’s happening today is focused more around automation.

    And, in that process, as software delivery matures, we see a lot of opportunities to really make it smarter and unlock a lot of data across the SDLC. So, having Lonne on the board just positions Armory extremely well to be a leader in that over the coming decade. So, very happy to have him involved with that deep level of expertise.

    Shimel: Absolutely. We’re gonna dive more into that as well in one second. Just, last question or last point I wanted to make regarding the announcement—you know, Insight led this round, I take it, but you also have some pretty nice names on your investor list even prior to this, right, if I’m not mistaken?

    DROdio: Yeah, we’ve been very blessed. You know, we started in Y Combinator’s W17 batch and we’ve had Noah Doyle from Javelin was our seed investor, Crosslink with a series A investor, Celeal from Bain has participated in a number of rounds. So, we also recently had Robin Vasan from Mango join as an investor as well.

    So, we just—you know, we were lucky to have a lot of great angel investors, including Eric Reese, the kind of father of the lean startup series; Andrew Miklas, a founding CTO of PagerDuty; and other angels like that. So, you know, we just—we’re in a bit of a special situation with Armory. We just, we’ve never had a hard time fundraising. I think a lot of that has to do with just this massive shift of computing into the cloud and all the challenges that come along with it.

    Shimel: Yep. Alright. We covered the announcement well. I think we did it justice. Let’s dive in now, guys. So, look—when you talk about Armory, you can’t talk about Armory without talking about Spinnaker, right? And again, in our audience—well, our audience is pretty savvy to this stuff. They probably have heard of Spinnaker. Spinnaker, of course, came out of the Netflix kind of factory there that brought so much great software tools to the forefront. But it was also—you know, Spinnaker was the father of, I mean, if Netflix was the father of Spinnaker, Google is the godfather. And, you know, they’ve done a lot for us.

    But I’m not giving it justice. DROdio, you’re much more well versed on Spinnaker. Carl, I don’t know how much of the Spinnaker story you know, but guys, give us the background.

    DROdio: Yeah, sure. Why don’t I—before we talk about Spinnaker, actually, let’s just talk about some of the trends that we’re seeing in computing and then back into how Spinnaker is solving for some of that.

    So, you know, we’ve been working with large enterprises, Fortune 500 and Global 2000 enterprises. And what we’re seeing—and I don’t think this will be a surprise to anybody who is deep in DevOps—is, enterprises are recognizing that, in order for them to thrive over the next decade, they really have to become software companies. Now, they may not die. They may just survive. But in order to really thrive, they have to make big investments, and their ability to take an idea and get it out into the world with safety and velocity—so, to really become good at navigating the SDLC, the software development life cycle.

    The big shift that we’re seeing is that companies are starting to move out of data centers and into the cloud, and what we’re seeing is—and I actually don’t think that every engineering leader is quite seeing it this way yet, but what we’re seeing is that a company’s path to production in a data center was a very static one. It didn’t change. Maybe they were running The Sphere. But they could afford to build it themselves, and they had to build it themselves because every data center’s different.

    And so, they would use these, what we would consider legacy kind of mutable configuration management tools like Chef and Puppet and Ansible to build these brittle paths into production, into their data centers.

    Well, that’s changing. The infrastructure layer is going from being very static to very fragmented, and we think that’s just beginning. There’s so much innovation coming from Amazon and Microsoft and Google that large enterprises, which have been building their own roads into production, are having a hard time dealing with this dumpster fire of innovation that’s coming from the cloud. I mean, if you look at AWS, it’s more than just AWS, it’s EC2, it’s ECS, it’s EKS, it’s Fargate, it’s Lambda—it’s whatever AWS is gonna announce at re:Invent in November. And, you know, that’s just AWS, let alone GCP or Azure or Pivotal or Oracle.

    And so, you know, when I talk to CIOs at Fortune 500 companies, they have a big problem, which is that they have these legacy and brittle paths to production that are not set up to enable them to really take advantage of this just massive amount of innovation that’s happening in the cloud. And so, they have a hard time actually getting their ideas out as features into the cloud.

    Netflix, as it started moving out of data centers and into the cloud a decade ago, recognized that there was a need for a platform that would not only codify the process of going from idea to featured production—so, that’s really all of the kind of human and cultural aspects of writing code and getting it out into the world. So, things like different stages. So, manager approvals, different environments, Dev/Stage/Prod, code scanning, vulnerability scanning—all of those things, security policies, compliance policies codify all of that into one golden path, but then also allow a company to have workload portability. So, allow a company to be able to decide if that code should go in as a VM on AWS or into a data center running Kubernetes.

    And so, they built Spinnaker to become much more sophisticated about really leveraging all of those different cloud targets. And so, now, they’re giving it away, right? Netflix and Google have codified the kind of decade of best practices they have at delivering software into the cloud, and they’re giving it away to anybody that is serious about becoming a software company.

    And so, that’s the real big opportunity that we see is to bring this open source project that codifies these best practices into Global 2000 and Fortune 500 companies that are serious about being able to thrive and not just survive over the next decade.

    Shimel: Absolutely. And a couple things there, right? As widespread as open source adoption is—and it is, it’s 95 percent penetration or higher—Global 2000 and Fortune 500 companies, when they do adopt open source, especially something platformish like Spinnaker, want to have some commercial entity usually wrapped around there, someone who’s gonna help provide support, and someone to go to if there’s a problem, someone who’s gonna continue kinda pushing the ball forward in terms of development. And that’s a role, right, that Armory is sort of fulfilling in the marketplace—the commercial Spinnaker.

    DROdio: Absolutely. Very much so. So, there’s a couple things about that. Spinnaker—I mean, if you think about what a company needs to do to become software first, the entire way they deliver value to the world is with some sort of platform either that they’ve built and housed, which is usually the case. They’ve extended Jenkins, which is really a CI tool, into delivery because they had to. But that’s really the entire way that they deliver value into the world is by being able to take code and get it out with safety and velocity.

    And so, when a company is starting to think about Spinnaker, I mean, that is like doing open heart surgery on a company’s core ability to create value. And Spinnaker is a huge and heavy code base. I mean, it is a big, meaty project. And so, companies need a lot of assistance and best practices and support to be successful with Spinnaker, because it is like open heart surgery for them.

    Now, the good news is that Armory is very, very good at doing this. So, we have the most expertise operationalizing Spinnaker inside complex enterprise environments and making it work within these complex environments of any company. As Netflix once joked with us, they only ever operationalized it once, right? We’ve done it many times.

    We’ve also built a number of features that are enterprise grade to make Spinnaker more consumable and valuable to the enterprise. So, things like being able to install it in an air gap data center environment, or pipelines as code that gets into this GitOps need of being able to create these pipeline definitions and then check them as code to make them reusable and make pipelines more standard across teams.

    So, there’s all sorts of features that we have built in our building that extend Spinnaker for specifically enterprise needs. But most broadly, what we are really doing is, we are championing Spinnaker and helping the enterprise adopt it so that they can become, truly, software first in a very sophisticated, multi-cloud way.

    Shimel: Absolutely.

    DROdio: One other thing that I would mention is really the cultural change that’s required from these large enterprises, which is probably its own separate podcast and conversation, but there’s this thing that we see in these Global 2000 companies, which is that most companies are not very good at managing risk in production in sophisticated ways. And what I mean when I say that is, most of these Industrial Age companies are used to building products or having services that must be perfect in production. When you’re building a car, you can’t have it come off the assembly line and fail right away.

    The kind of cosmic joke is that the slower you are when you’re writing code, the less safe you become, and by moving faster, you actually become safer. But that’s a terrifying cultural concept to these companies that don’t wanna break customer trust or damage brand equity in production.

    A platform like Spinnaker allows them to become much more sophisticated about managing risk in production. So, things like a canary deployment allow companies to not nuke their entire user base when they ship a new feature. They can, instead, limit the blast radius. And so, it’s an important cultural element here to bring a platform like Spinnaker into the company to give, really, the executives and management the kind of license and the trust to start to innovate faster and to move faster in ways that allow them to feel safe, but then become much more sophisticated about the way that they manage risk.

    So, there’s a whole cultural aspect to Spinnaker that is very necessary to give companies these tools that they need to actually undergo this digital transformation.

    Shimel: There’s a cultural aspect to everything with DevOps, even.

    DROdio: Yeah. [Laughter]

    Shimel: But let me—hey, Carl, we’ve been negligent, here. Let’s bring you into the conversation. So, Carl, it’s a unique kind of opportunity. It’s almost a double-edged sword, though, in that, you know, you get to, you’re in charge of marketing what, in essence, is this fantastic platform, Spinnaker, and then, on top of that, what Armory is doing to enhance and make it better for large organizations to adopt Spinnaker—you know, it’s a great opportunity, but it’s a little scary it’s that big.

    As newly appointed or here a few months now VP of Marketing, what do you see as the challenge here in going to market?

    Landers: Sounds like you’ve been living in my office, Alan, the way you just laid that out. But, you know—yes, it’s a big challenge. The way we look at it, though, I think is fairly straightforward. We’re devoting our resources to making Spinnaker a success. As the Spinnaker community grows, as more people are aware and are using and are having success with Spinnaker, the right number will come to Armory for help when they need it.

    And so, as the marketer at Armory, my focus is, the majority of my effort is—how do we make Spinnaker a success? How do we grow awareness and use of Spinnaker so that more organizations are experiencing the benefit? We know that we’ll get our fair share. So, marketing Armory is important, but top of mind for all of us here is making sure Spinnaker is a big success. Does that make sense?

    Shimel: Makes perfect sense. And we would be negligent if we didn’t mention this in that regard that, I guess it was now about six months ago, maybe eight months ago, both Netflix and Google joined what’s called the CDF—Armory as well—joined the CDF, the CD Foundation, which is a sister organization to Cloud Native Computing Foundation, all under the auspices of The Linux Foundation. And, you know, we talk about a community and we talk about making Spinnaker successful—that has to, I guess, play into it.

    How big a role do you see the CDF playing into this, guys?

    DROdio: Carl, I’ll be happy to let you start there and then I can add some color, if you’d like.

    Landers: Sure, happy to. Well, we are a proud member of the CDF along with the other organizations you mentioned, and there are several projects in there, including Jenkins and Jenkins X and Tekton and Spinnaker. And the CDF is forming up nicely and we’re contributing to that foundation and helping it take off, and it is gonna be a great way to help build the community around all of these projects, Alan.

    One of the things that’s gonna be a great addition to the community is, we have a new developer, evangelist, open source leader joining Armory, Dee Kumar. Dee was actually doing this job for the CNCF and for Kubernetes. So, super experienced about how to grow a successful open source community and market effectively, and she did that at the CNCF and is coming over to join Armory on Monday to help us and help the CDF repeat the success of Kubernetes with Spinnaker. So, that’s super exciting.

    Shimel: That’s great. That’s big, that’s big. DROdio, do you want to add—you said you wanted to add a little color?

    DROdio: So, you know, I spend my day talking to Fortune 500 CIOs, CTOs and what I’m really seeing is that DevOps is something that I think executive suites at large companies have considered to be tactical, and it really hasn’t been—it hasn’t risen up to the level where a CIO or CTO or even a VPM just is so focused on it.

    That’s really changing. As companies realize that they must become software first to compete, DevOps is becoming much more strategic, and I believe that CIOs are going to have to own it personally and be very involved in the cultural change that’s required to transform their companies into ones that become very good at getting through the SDLC in minutes instead of months.

    And that’s really why we created Armory. The reason Armory exists is to align very closely with the needs of Global 2000 enterprises that re committed to that transformation and that want to invest in sophisticated, modern platforms like Spinnaker to enable that. We see Spinnaker as powering the core of our platform as we build it. Spinnaker really solves for the delivery challenges that companies have.

    There’s a lot more to the SDLC than just delivery, and so, we are really making a big bet on Spinnaker while having an eye towards the needs of the CIO and solving for all those other blockages in the SDLC that a company has that slow them down.

    So, Spinnaker is just this incredible platform that we’re putting at the core of our strategy and our platform as Armory grows and matures. And the first thing that Carl said is to cement its status as the de facto standard for Cloud Native software delivery. And then also, having all the major cloud vendors contribute and be involved has been a huge step for that as well. So, I think it’s becoming very obvious that, if a company’s really serious about moving workloads into the cloud, Spinnaker is the way to do that at scale.

    Shimel: Excellent. Absolutely. Guys, we’re running low—we’re way over time at this point. I did want to just mention or bring out a few other things, and Carl or DROdio can answer this. In terms of references, we’re talking Fortune 500, we’re talking Global 2000—can you give us some examples of organizations that are using Spinnaker? And if they’re using Armory a well, great, but you know, just to kind of bring home that message of the kind of organizations that are relying on Spinnaker.

    DROdio: Sure. So, on the Spinnaker.io website, which is the project site, there are a number of companies that are publicly listed that are using Spinnaker. Companies like Cisco and Target and Under Armour and Samsung and others. There are actually several hundred enterprises using Spinnaker that are not publicly using it, but are making big bets on Spinnaker. And there are also many enterprises that are using Armory specifically. And so, those include some of the world’s largest technology companies, some of the world’s largest banks, some of the world’s largest health care companies.

    So, we are very dedicated to ensuring their success with Spinnaker. We believe that Armory is the best way for a company to be successful with Spinnaker. But more broadly, we’re also really working hard as deep contributors to the open source project to make Spinnaker very consumable, easy to onboard, easy to self-run POCs and get very quick time to value.

    So, there’s a lot of focus, like Carl said, with the series B in really making Spinnaker easy to try and easy to be successful with as an open source project, and then making it very enterprise grade and bulletproof for enterprises that are putting it at the core of their hybrid and multi-cloud strategies.

    Shimel: Excellent. Excellent, excellent. I know—again, just one more thing and then I’m gonna call it a wrap. There is, as part of CloudNativeCon and KubeCon, there’s a Spinnaker and CDF. Well, there’s both a CDF and I thought a Spinnaker Con coming up in San Diego.

    DROdio: Yeah, Carl, why don’t you talk a bit about that, because I think there’s a few opportunities for people to get involved.

    Landers: Absolutely. So, Alan, I think you’re referring to the Spinnaker Summit which is coming up. It’s going to be collocated with KubeCon in San Diego. It’s taking place on—let’s see if I get the dates right—November 16th and 17th, so over that weekend, and then KubeCon starts on the Monday, Tuesday following. So, it’s gonna be a huge Cloud Native fest in San Diego.

    We were just reviewing the CFP, the proposals that came in today. There were, oh, 80 or 90 sessions submitted from amazing companies to speak at the summit, and we’re just going through right now and picking the best ones to actually put on the agenda. It’s gonna be a great event and information is available from the Spinnaker.io website. You can get there and learn all about the Spinnaker Summit. Thanks for the plug.

    Shimel: Absolutely. And you know what, when it’s live, we’ll try to get some announcement—when the CFP is live, we’ll get an announcement out.

    DROdio: And, hey, Alan? We haven’t talked about this yet; Carl, we haven’t talked about this yet, but why don’t we just go ahead and offer something up, here, because we do have a culture of defaulting to action.

    Why don’t we create a discount code for anybody who’s listening to this podcast and would like to attend the Spinnaker Summit and maybe we can make it devopsy.kinsta.cloud or something like that—

    Shimel: Fantastic.

    DROdio: – and Armory will provide a bit of a discount for anybody who would like to attend to help anybody who’s listening convince their manager that it’s something worth going to. So, I don’t know how much of a discount we can provide, but I’m happy to commit to doing something.

    Landers: Absolutely.

    Shimel: Thank you very much, DROdio. And you know what, for listeners—take advantage of it. Guys, what I’ll try to do—Carl, if you can get me the details and the code, I’ll include that in the show notes for the podcast, and anyone listening to this can go check it out there as well as, it’ll be in the devopsy.kinsta.cloud article for it, as well.

    DROdio: Perfect.

    Landers: Sounds good. I’ve got DROdio’s credit card number coming over to you.

    DROdio: That’s right. [Laughter]

    Shimel: [Laughter] Fantastic!

    DROdio: And then, also, for anybody who would like to learn more about Spinnaker, there is a Slack workspace, and I would highly recommend that anybody check that out. You can get to it on the Spinnaker website, but you can also just go to Join.Spinnaker.io and enter your e-mail address and then you’ll be in that community.

    There’s over 7,000 people in there, and it’s a very active community. We are very active in there, as is Netflix and Google and many others. And if you—you know, it’s a very friendly community, so if anybody would really like to ask questions, don’t be afraid to ask any newbie questions in there, we’ll be happy to answer them.

    Shimel: Fantastic. Guys, I gotta tell you, this was the longest 15-minute interview I’ve ever done.

    DROdio: [Laughter] And yet the shortest at the same time, feels like. [Laughter]

    Shimel: Yeah. I told you, it goes quick. I apologize, but you know what, I think it was well worthwhile. First of all, guys—congratulations on the series B. You know what? In today’s world, it seems every day some company’s announcing funding, but there’s a lot of entrepreneurs out there, and DROdio, you know this, right, who never get to raise money.

    DROdio: Yeah.

    Shimel: They try and try and try and they just can’t get it done. And the fact that you guys are doing it is a testament to both Spinnaker and Armory’s plan as well as what you’re doing, so, congratulations—and to you guys individually—so, congratulations and success.

    And then, secondly, we’re excited to see Spinnaker take its place in the CD universe, here.

    DROdio: Yeah, likewise. Thank you for the support, Alan, as well.

    Shimel: My pleasure.

    Landers: Thank you, Alan.

    Shimel: Hey, alright—DROdio and Carl Landers from Armory announcing their series B, and it’s all about Spinnaker and Armory here today. This is Alan Shimel for devopsy.kinsta.cloud, and you’ve just listened to another DevOps Chat.

    — Alan Shimel

  • JFrog swampUP: DevOps Culture Is a Powerful Force

    JFrog swampUP: DevOps Culture Is a Powerful Force

    The notion that culture is such an important part of DevOps and high-performing IT teams gets plenty of lip service, but not every organization really buys into it. In my years covering the DevOps space, I can count only a handful of companies that truly represent the epitome of “DevOps culture.” One of these companies is JFrog.

    Every time I have the chance to interact with “the Frogs” and their community, I am reminded of what a powerful force culture can be in forging success. At the recent swampUP user conference in San Francisco, the JFrog secret sauce was again on display. From the little things, such as designing and decorating the conference themselves, to the bigger things in terms of the theme of the sessions and activities, swampUP was a great and learning time for all. Our Digital Anarchist team was on hand and we did a bunch of videos that you can watch up on DigitalAnarchist.io. The videos are with speakers at the conference, attendees, JFrog employees and partners.

    One of my favorite videos from swampUP was the one I have embedded here. It is the three co-founders of JFrog—Yoav Landman, Fred Simon and Shlomi Ben Haim and I discussing business and what makes JFrog’s culture so special. Have a listen and maybe get some insight into making the culture of your own organization better.

    Also, if you are in Israel Sept. 24, check out Yalla DevOps, a first-time conference JFrog and others are producing that looks like it will be a great event. The Digital Anarchist team will be there covering with video (even broadcasting live), along with John Willis as a keynote speaker; Jayne Groll, my co-founder at DevOps Institute; and others.

    In the meantime, enjoy the video:

    Transcript

    Alan Shimel: Hey, everyone, it’s Alan Shimel for devopsy.kinsta.cloud on Digital Anarchist, and we’re here in San Francisco at JFrog swampUP 2019. It’s been a great conference, and I’m really, really lucky and happy to be joined—I feel like I’m at a Beatles reunion, for some reason. I’ve got Ringo, Paul, John—

    Shlomi Ben Haim: Who’s John Lennon? I’m afraid. [Laughter]

    Shimel: – done. Anyway, but no, we’re not at a Beatles reunion, but we do have the three JFrog co-founders here with me. I’m gonna let them introduce themselves. We’re gonna go to the far right to Fred. Fred, go ahead.

    Fred Simon: Hi, I’m Fred Simon, co-founder and Chief Data Scientist today at JFrog and I’m really happy to be here. Thank you.

    Shimel: Thanks, Fred.

    Yoav Landman: Yoav Landman, CTO and co-founder of JFrog.

    Ben Haim: I’m Shlomi Ben Haim, CEO and co-founder of JFrog.

    Shimel: Three co-founders on one panel—there you go. So, guys, first of all, congratulations on another great event.

    Simon: Thank you.

    Shimel: You know, you know this, but you guys don’t know this—my wife wants to come work with you.

    Simon: [Laughter]

    Shimel: Because she loves the company and the culture and the buzz that she gets when she’s around the Frogs that, you know, when she grows up, she wants to come work at JFrog.

    But all kidding aside, it’s a tremendous—you can’t come to a JFrog event, whether it be swampUP or SwamPower or Meetup or whatever without kinda feeling the love, right? Feeling that culture. And it’s an interesting dynamic. Take it from me—I go to a lot of conferences, I deal with a lot of companies. They don’t all have that. They don’t have that culture.

    So, I wanted to talk a little bit about—look, 2009, you started Artifactory, right? What was the idea on the culture, here? How do you instill that culture—not in the community, right now. Let’s talk about the company, because every high performing team ranked culture as important. How do you instill that pride to be a Frog, we’re all in this together, we’re making the world a better place? Who wants to answer?

    Simon: You want to start? You started this mess! [Laughter]

    Yoav Landman: So, yeah, Artifactory started before JFrog. So, Artifactory was there to solve a real pain, and we were all developers, and it’s our second—except for Shlomi—it’s our second venture.

    So, I guess this idea of solving pains, being very connected to the community, to customers, speaking a lot with customers, getting feedback from every engineer and every employee in JFrog that comes and says that they think that something should work differently or that we should develop something that may contribute to more success of our product is something that is instilled into the culture of JFrog.

    Shimel: Excellent.

    Simon: Yeah, we got lucky that everybody else who is working at JFrog is working for someone like him. So, that’s scratching our own itch. So, at the end of the day, you are a developer at JFrog and you hear about a customer having an issue, you feel it, because this is your job. You’re writing code, you’re a developer, and you know that what you are doing is impacting people. And so, this strong care about the customer and the strong feedback of the culture was here right from the beginning.

    And then Shlomi one day decided, “Oh, that’s too big, too full of a culture. I’m gonna try to write it down.” [Laughter]

    Shimel: [Laughter] And Shlomi, with all due respect, you like to deflect and you let him talk, but you’re the CEO. At some point, the buck stops here, right? You know, it’s important to you, but how do you build this culture? How do you get this loyalty, this feeling of buy-in from people?

    Ben Haim: That’s, you know, I’m listening to the question and I’m  getting excited like it’s my first day at JFrog. I think culture matters. Everybody knows that, everybody said that. But it’s hard to practice. It’s hard to maintain it for 10 years. And this—this goes back 18 years. I think I’m with these guys before I got married, and what you see in JFrog is that when you have the right culture, it’s viral. But it’s not just an internal move, it’s also reflecting outside of the company.

    And you spoke about Artifactory and how it started, and when we started, the only thing that we had was the technology that we believed in and ourselves. And it’s very hard to start a company when nobody understands what you do on the technical level, nobody understands what’s the pain. There is no budget line for it. So, the only thing that you can fight with is your team.

    Shimel: Right.

    Ben Haim: And just yesterday, as we set up this amazing conference here, I saw more than 70 JFrog employees. You know that we do our conferences ourselves.

    Shimel: Right.

    Ben Haim: No producers, it’s just us. Our team built it for the community. And I saw them here walking, and it doesn’t matter whether it’s building Artifactory or Xray or JFrog Pipelines or JFrog Distribution or swampUP—same culture, same values, comes over and over again as our one very big advantage.

    Shimel: Absolutely. But now—so, that in and of itself is fantastic, right? But now, there’s a second key ingredient to the success. How do we take that culture that we built at JFrog and let the community, infect the community with it, right, to use a security term? How do we transform the community with that same—not transform, infuse that community with that same culture, with that same passion?

    Because that’s something that always, again, it screams, right? It’s easy to see. And building that kinda community is not easy, because at the end of the day, today’s software world with open source and everything else is community, right? It’s all about—so how, is that something that’s done on purpose? If so, how? What do we do?

    Landman: I can try and start.

    Shimel: Go ahead, Yoav.

    Landman: So, part of being driven by input is also being very direct. And it all comes down to people—at the end of the day, it’s all people. So, the way that we interact with the community, the way that we interact with customers is not very much different than the way we interact internally in JFrog.

    So, by bonding with people, by investing in clear and open discussions with no fluff, I think that drives results, at the end of the day.

    Shimel: Fred?

    Simon: First of all, I don’t think it’s intentional. I mean, it’s just the way we are and the way—and it’s pure and it’s just true, okay? We truly care about the suffering of our customer, and the customer feels it. So, once he feels it and then he’s part of it—and sometimes, it’s a little bit disturbing for the customer, because the customer feels like he’s gonna get more help and better integration with the JFrog community and with JFrog than with his peers inside the company, because of the [Laughter]—

    Shimel: Yeah, exactly.

    Simon:  – some cultural clash between the company and JFrog. And so, by, you know, not saying, “Okay, whenever a customer is telling you something, just be compassionate”—we never told our employees, “Please be compassionate about the customer.” This is just, this is who we are, and this is what the—and they see, and the customer feels it, and he sees the effort we put to make sure that… And it’s like here, the communication, also. The effort of communication, the effort of knowledge, knowledge transfer. We are not shy on transferring what we know, what we need, what we did. It’s just—yeah, I think truth and natural truth is a [Cross talk].

    Shimel: So, the word that comes to my mind is genuine, right? You can’t fake this. It has to be genuine. And if it’s not genuine, people see through it and it smells, right? So, I think that’s a key ingredient of that, for sure.

    And the transfer, too—I mean, I’ve done, I don’t know, maybe 10 interviews, 12 interviews, maybe more today, to a lot of customers. And that knowledge transfer and sharing in this kinda—it’s huge to them.

    So, now—so, we’ve got the culture to the community. Now, we’re gonna talk, Yoav, you said Artifactory existed before there was a JFrog, right? It’s 10 years, right? In technology terms, that’s like dog years, it’s 90 years, you know? It’s almost 100 years old already.

    Landman: Frog’s years. [Laughter]

    Shimel: Frog years. How do you—so, obviously, the Artifactory today is not Artifactory, what it was.

    Landman: For sure.

    Shimel: JFrog today is not what JFrog was. We mentioned something things—JFrog Pipelines, there was the Shippable acquisition, Xray came out about two years ago now, right? Two, three years ago—Xray. JFrog today—let’s talk about the technology, the tools, the solutions. What are you most—you’re CTO, Yoav. What are you most proud of with that?

    Landman: Artifactory was the centerpiece and it still is. It’s the place where you put—we call it the golden bits. It’s what you’re going to, at the end of the day, put in production, right? But the world has changed dramatically since Artifactory was written. It was just a very basic Maven remote proxy. And then other features came about, but the whole DevOps and the whole pipeline automation process that we’re seeing today within companies, it didn’t exist back then to the same level of automation.

    So, bringing in security into the pipeline is an integral part, with Shippable, making sure—we can maybe talk about this later—making sure that we can drive the pipeline, adding functionality to give you insights into the pipeline. These are all things that came along and are going to be injected into the pipeline from JFrog, from other companies, but this is the natural evolution. Artifactory is still the base of what you’re going to shift, but all the services around it is what makes JFrog a lot bigger and why it’s very different than what we started.

    Shimel: Fred, I wanna come to you in a second, but I have a follow up question for Yoav. So, Yoav, I think another great example is—so, in the last year, you announced you’re gonna start a repository for Go, yeah? And so, that’s an example of, you see what the community is doing. I spoke yesterday to a Microsoft fellow here who’s, like, their advocate for the Go community—so happy to be here because JFrog’s supporting him with that.

    Where does that come from? Like, where—the idea of saying, “Hey, we should do something for Go?”

    Landman: So, it comes from, I think, two angles. The first is purely technical, just being able to be there first. The other one is, I think, a little bit cultural, just being able to instill innovation into the company, even before the market adoption happens. And it kind of goes together. Both goals, they serve one another. So, we did the same, by the way, with Docker. With Docker, we had support for the Docker beta versions, even before Docker was a thing.

    And the same thing we wanted to do with Go, even when the standards were not that stable yet and we had to rewrite our implementation once the standards have stabilized. But yeah, this is the source of this motivation.

    Shimel: Fred, I wanna go to Liquid Software with you, right? So, it’s a book, we can probably have someone throw us a copy for a prop, if we can get Brian maybe get us a Liquid Software book over here, it’s right by Netta.

    But you’re one of the co-authors, Yoav, Baruch is one. So, that’s another concept, right? This whole concept of liquid software and what it is. Talk to us about that. What do we—where does that come from? How does that fit?

    Simon: Yeah, so the—by the way, where it goes to Go and all these kind of communities and things like that? The origin of manipulating software and trying to put software in production into an environment, we always try to manipulate it as boxes. A box where we put a bunch of software and we try to run it. And with the advent of releasing multiple ________ multiple versions and making all those services micro-micro-microservices—basically, the flow of those packages got higher and higher and the size of the packages got smaller and smaller.

    And so, instead of thinking about it in terms of ship management and supply chain management of shipping packages, it didn’t make sense any more. It was really, really a big burden on the tagging.

    And so, when you want to put a piece of software in production, you have the final run time, which is the software in the hands of your end user, the one that really, really wants to use it. And deploying software is actually easy. You just created a new piece of software, you just run it for the first time, and it’s quite easy, and then you run. What’s hard is to update it, okay? Deploying is easy, updating is hard. And the only way to update it is to get the new version. And if you keep thinking about it in terms of blocks, you’re stuck. You need to think about it in terms of pipes and liquid and this is the liquid software. Is that, as soon as you create a run time that can receive software, you need to think about all the pipes that you need to plug to get the liquid to it and to update it continuously.

    And it changed all the way to the developer. This is—it starts from the pressure from the end users from, like you said, your wife, your daughter or whatever that wants to get the latest software all the time without any, and it put the pressure all the way to the developer. And what’s funny in our environment is that it’s hard for a developer to do it correctly, and a lot of times they said, because they are used to it, when they interact with technology, actually, the developers are a lot more, first, reluctant to update software. If you see all the developers and their phones, iOS and Android, they have the most, the oldest version, the one that doesn’t update. [Laughter] And they want to control [Cross talk].

    Shimel: It’s the mechanic’s car.

    Simon: Yes, exactly. [Laughter]

    Shimel: Never drive the mechanic’s car.

    Simon: And so, for them, it’s not that complicated to do a complicated update. So, it really comes from the pressure from the market, and life is ________ is a really good, it’s life pushing it and so liquid software is gonna happen whenever it’s gonna happen.

    But the change that we need to push is to put the tools and the mechanism and the practices into the hands of the developer. Because it’s not that hard. It’s hard, it’s some work and stuff, but it’s not as impossible as the community of developers think.

    So, it’s a book, I highly recommend it.

    Shimel: Here’s the book. We’ve got the book, thanks to the folks offstage.

    Simon: But it kind of tried to remove this fear from the developer community of writing liquid software. It’s possible.

    Ben Haim: And, you know, Alan, I think that the experience of being in a very successful company for over eight years and not being able to explain what is it that we are doing, why it’s more than just managing your binaries, why it’s more than just providing you with a better repository. And when Fred came up with this phrase, liquid software, it was one presentation that everybody in JFrog understood and immediately aligned to it. Because this is actually what we believe in. And when you go and raise your Series D and you say—

    Shimel: Which was this year.

    Ben Haim: – this last year, last October, seven months ago. And when we said—nine months ago.

    Shimel: Yeah. [Laughter]

    Ben Haim: When we said, “We are the liquid software company,” we had all kinds of eyebrows moving, and people are asking us more and more about that, because they start to understand that this is beyond just the vision of JFrog. This is where the world is going. We are just one of the enablers of the liquid software world.

    Shimel: Absolutely. So, first of all, I still can’t explain to my family what I do for a living, but that’s another story.

    Ben Haim: [Laughter] The story of my life.

    Shimel: Yeah. But, you know, in some ways, this is also the story of JFrog, because 9 years ago, 10 years ago, Artifactory, I would’ve told you, “Liquid software? What is it? What do you”—stop.

    Ben Haim: Yeah. Stop with the drugs.

    Shimel: Right. But yet, the kernel of what is liquid software according to you was there in Artifactory 10, 11 years ago. Yeah.

    Landman: The essence is.

    Shimel: Yeah. and so, it’s—you know, I learned once, what we do in technology is, 99 percent of the time evolutionary, not revolutionary. And so, this is the revolution of it.

    So, I’d like to, now, if we can—and Liquid Software is available, you can get it. The book’s on Amazon. I think it’s on—

    Simon: Audible. It’s Audible, also.

    Shimel: Yep. We had it on devopsy.kinsta.cloud on a link, too, at one time. We probably still do, obviously.

    But I wanna now turn a little bit, you mentioned D round was a couple dollars, 165,000,000—that’s not even shekels, dollars.

    Ben Haim: [Laughter] It sounds better in shekels, by the way.

    Shimel: Yeah. It’s like the speed of light. But you know what, when you raised—Yoav and I were talking earlier—you raise that kind of money, with a lot of money comes a lot of responsibility, a lot of expectations. Where does JFrog go from here, right, and how do you chart that course, right? As a CEO, CTO, developer advocate, technology—how do we, where do you, where do you go? How do you know where to go, right? You’ve got tremendous resources now at your disposal, probably more than you might have dreamed you’d have to do.

    Where do we go and how do chart that course?

    Ben Haim:  So, I’ll try to answer that from a high level and then, of course, Fred and Yoav can take it to the technology solution. I think that JFrog has done something really big. And when you see what happened in the world, it’s beyond the developer. It’s beyond the people who are actually using our solution. It’s the destination that was changed. And what people expect to have is a fast and fluid software update. And if JFrog, with 5,000 customers today and growing fast, can be the company that powers this need, then I think we have a very big story.

    So, when we raised our money—you know, when you raise such an amount with such an evaluation, you also understand that the dream about M&A and exit is kind of pushed away and the list of acquired got changed to maybe three or four companies.

    Shimel: Very small—a handful.

    Ben Haim: So, you have to go and ask your wife about it, because this is 10 years, together 30 years of investment that our family was part of this journey. And I asked Donna, my wife, and I said, “Donna, you understand that there will be no exit soon. We have to go all the way—all the way towards it.” And the answer that I got is that, “If this is really what you say it is, if it’s really changing the world, if it’s really about electricity and water and aircraft and cars and everything you do, I’m so excited about it, and I’m not even a technologist, then you guys should go after it.”

    So, I think we have made the right choice, and you’re right, there is a lot of responsibility here. It’s a responsibility not just to our VCs, but also to our employees that trust us and follow us, and also to our customers—

    Shimel: And the community.

    Ben Haim: – that comes and uses it and over and over again, we are growing at 150 new logos per month—new logos per month. These are people that adopt this solution and say, “This is what we are going to do in the next 10 to 20 years. We are making software liquid.”

    Landman: So, JFrog for a long time is not just the sum of the founders, it’s much, much bigger than that, and we have wonderful people in the company that leaped forward with JFrog and take the company forward, basically, for us and for the other investors.

    One thing that you have to understand is that, today, JFrog is taking the responsibility of serving huge organizations and our end customers are also sharing this responsibility of serving the automation for huge organizations, and the automation patterns that we are seeing, they are not constant. They are changing and they keep evolving over time.

    So, this is kind of great, an ever growing challenge for us to develop a new set of tools, a new set of solutions, new pains to cure. To tell you that we exactly know what the next pains are going to be—we don’t. If we would, it would probably be too boring to continue going, like Shlomi said. But this is basically what drives us and keeps us committed to this responsibility.

    Simon: Yeah, still a ton of work to do. I mean, the liquid software vision, there’s still a lot, a lot, a lot to do. And like Yoav said, the responsibility that we have as being a critical piece of keeping those pipes, making sure they don’t leak, making sure nobody’s injecting stuff into it. And making it happen and making the water system trusted and the software delivery trusted is a huge amount of work, responsibility, and systems that we have to create on the way, we have to build, and we have to scale to worldwide—really, worldwide impact and environment.

    So, you can say that 160 is a lot of money, and when I see the amount of things that need to be done, maybe not. [Laughter]

    Shimel: Yeah. Well, there’s always more out there. Guys, we’re way over time, but I wanted to end it with this. I sold my first company in 1997, and I sold it to, well, a guy named Brad Feld who’s a pretty well-known venture capitalist himself. But his mentor was an older Jewish man, Len Fassler—a little older, he was like my grandpa. I couldn’t negotiate against him.

    Ben Haim: [Laughter] No, it’s impossible.

    Shimel: It was like negotiating with your grandpa. But Len had good—he did several billion dollar companies, rollups and good stuff. And I then worked for him and we did 30 acquisitions in 36 months, and we wound up taking the company public in the dot cot days.

    And one of the things he always said to every founding group, whether we bought the company or not, was, “Any time you can build a company that someone’s willing to reach into their pocket to invest in and write you a check, you have a lot to be proud of,” right? To write a check for $165,00,000.00—that’s plenty to be proud of. But even beyond the money, when you look out at swampUP, when you look out at all those Frogs’ faces, you guys have a lot to be proud of, so congratulations.

    Ben Haim: Thank you very much.

    Shimel: Thanks for joining us.

    Ben Haim: Thank you.

    Shimel: And continued success. Hey, we’re gonna wrap it here in San Francisco from JFrog swampUP, this is Alan Shimel for devopsy.kinsta.cloud and the Digital Anarchist.

    — Alan Shimel

  • Kentik: Cloud Native Applications Need Network Analytics

    Kentik: Cloud Native Applications Need Network Analytics

    Moving everything into the cloud seems to have taken the spotlight from the network. As the internet is ubiquitous, who worries about the networks? Kentik has a notion that in the age of cloud native, network analytics are as important as ever. In fact, network analytics may be more important than ever.

    I sat down with Jonah Kowall, CTO of Kentik, to discuss this issue. Of course having Jonah here in our Digital Anarchist studios, allowed us to explore some other areas including Jonah’s experience as a Gartner analyst, and then working at AppDynamics.

    Kentik is doing some really interesting things around network analytics to help app performance and even security. The use cases for this are pretty broad. From edge, to cloud (multi-cloud and hybrid), data center and containers, Kentik has a great use case.

    With so much going on with NewOps, NoOps (I hate this one), AIOps, DataOps and more, it sure does seem like Ops is the place to be these days. On top of this, as much as things change, it seems that what’s old is new and no matter what, the network still matters.

    Have a listen as Jonah explains further:

     

    — Alan Shimel

  • DevOps Chat: ‘War, Peace & IT’ With Marc Schwartz

    DevOps Chat: ‘War, Peace & IT’ With Marc Schwartz

    Marc Schwartz is one of those rare individuals who is not only a great IT exec, but he also can analyze what works and doesn’t work and write it up in a way that helps others. His “A Seat at the Table” is still one of my favorite DevOps books.

    Marc’s new book is called, “War, Peace & IT.” You can download an excerpt of it here: dl.orangedox.com/WarPeaceITExcerpt

    In this DevOps Chat, we speak with Marc about the book and some of the lessons behind it. Have a listen and check out the book ASAP.

    As usual, the streaming audio is immediately below, followed by the transcript of our conversation.

    Transcript

    Alan Shimel: Hey, everyone, it’s Alan Shimel for devopsy.kinsta.cloud, and you’re listening to another DevOps Chat. I’m really delighted to have as my guest on DevOps Chat today none other than Marc Schwartz. Marc, if you don’t know, is an AWS executive, multiple author on some of the greatest books on DevOps you’re gonna read—”A Seat at the Table” is still one of my all-time favorites—and I think as he’s described in the latest blurb on IT Revolution, an iconoclastic CIO.

    Marc, welcome to DevOps Chat.

    Marc Schwartz: [Laughter] Thanks. I’m glad to be here.

    Shimel: So, Marc, what is an iconoclastic CIO?

    Schwartz: [Laughter] I like to question assumptions. You know, I find that, very often, people are frustrated. There are obstacles to what they’re trying to accomplish, and the problem is that they’re constrained in all sorts of ways, and if you don’t question the assumptions and knock away some of those constraints, they’re gonna continue to be frustrated—so, that’s what I’m all about.

    Shimel: Yep. I agree. So, I don’t want to spend a lot of time, but Marc, we mentioned you’re from AWS, but I didn’t really mention a role. Just so our audience, who may not be familiar—what currently is your role with AWS?

    Schwartz: They call me an enterprise strategist, and what means is, I’m part of a small team of ex-IT leaders, many of us ex-CIOs or CTOs of large enterprises who did digital transformation, moved to the cloud, and what we do now is, we work with executives from large enterprises to help them overcome some of the challenges that they face as they’re trying to do a transformation.

    So, often, it’s things like cultural change, or organizational change, or organizational structure, financing models, people skills, things like that. And we speak at conferences, we write books and blogs and we work with individual customers.

    Shimel: Very cool. No, let’s jump in, Marc. You’ve got a new book, just recently came out. It’s available on Amazon, by the way, in case anyone is interested, as well as Barnes and Noble, 800-CEO-READ, Indiebound, BAM and any other place where you can find decent books. It’s called “War and Peace and IT: Business Leadership, Technology, and Success in the Digital Age.”

    Marc, share with our audience—what’s the book about?

    Schwartz: Well, the book is essentially an answer to a challenge that people gave me after they read “A Seat at the Table.” Because, in “A Seat at the Table,” it was written primarily for IT leaders, and throughout that book, I made the argument that we needed to get rid of this business versus IT distinction, you know? The way we talk about the business and IT as if it’s two separate things, the way that we see IT as taking requirements from a business and executing on those requirements, but that way of thinking is no longer effective. We need to find a way to bring IT into the business itself.

    And people responded very well to that message in “A Seat at the Table,” but they said, “This doesn’t work unless somebody tells the business folks the same thing, you know? [Laughter] We can’t just change the relationship ourselves. So, somebody should write a book for the business executives to explain to them what you’re talking about.” And I realized that that same book, if I could write it, would also help a lot of the executives that I was talking to as part of my job who were facing impediments to their transformations.

    So, I wrote a book that essentially said, “One of the big impediments to your transformation is that the relationship between the business and IT is not the right relationship, and here’s how you can change it, and here’s why it will make a big difference for you.”

    Shimel: Excellent. So, you know, I think you laid it out pretty well there, Marc, for people. You know, I’m just back—we were talking offline and I told you I was at a KubeCon + CloudNativeCon in Barcelona last week and it was another great event, 7,500 people.

    And what really kinda hit me square between the eyes was the fact that though this is a fairly technical event, right? We’re talking about cloud native and a lot of open source software programs and ops procedures, the business angle of it, the amount of business people who are there trying to get smart about what’s the latest trends, what’s the wave, if you will, in IT, and how could they leverage things like serverless or Kubernetes and some of these newer things to make their business better, not necessarily because it’s cool or, you know, shiny trinket syndrome or anything like that.

    But really, how does—when does rubber meet the road with this technology? And, you know, I can’t help—I mean, I’m heartened by it, Mark, but I still don’t know if business executives are all bought into that.

    Schwartz: Yeah.

    Shimel: Your thoughts?

    Schwartz: Well, I don’t think it’s about the cloud, per se, or DevOps or whatever it is. What really is important is how the cloud and DevOps and new ways of doing IT empower businesses to do new things that they couldn’t do before. And I think that’s what the non-IT business executives need to learn about what’s possible now that was not possible before.

    And the reason why they have to, why it’s an urgent matter is because their competitors are, you know? Whatever tools you have available to you, your competitors also have, and if you’re not using them, and your competitor is, then you’re at a business disadvantage. And I think mostly, it comes down to a question of speed, one way or another. So, using the cloud well, using DevOps well, lets you move at a much faster pace to get IT capabilities to change your business.

    And that pace is important not just for the obvious reasons that you need time to market, you need to get first mover advantages, you need to respond quickly when you competitors disrupt you, but also for more subtle reasons, because we now use speed as a way to test out ideas quickly and see if they’re gonna work, and manage our risk by testing out ideas before we fully commit to them, and we use speed to get feedback from customers and users and alter our product offerings based on what we’re able to learn, and we use speed to mitigate risk to improve our security posture, to improve our availability of systems.

    So, speed becomes a really important factor, and the cloud, DevOps, you know, their technical implementations, but they happen to help companies achieve speed, and that’s the important message, I think, that executives need to take away.

    [su_pullquote align=”right” class=”do_blockquote”]I don’t think it’s about the cloud, per se, or DevOps or whatever it is. What really is important is how the cloud and DevOps and new ways of doing IT empower businesses to do new things that they couldn’t do before.[/su_pullquote]
    Shimel: I agree. But, you know, there’s an old saying—speed can kill. Great speed kills, too, right?

    Schwartz: [Laughter] Well, if you’re using the right model for speed, it doesn’t kill, and the reason for that is that the models that use speed usually also use automated controls or guardrails. So, what you want, and the idea is, you want to be able to move really quickly, but within the boundaries of guardrails that enforce compliance, enforce security, enforce quality and it’s possible to do both. We always thought, in the past, that there was this trade-off between speed and stability or speed and quality, and it turns out that, in this DevOps world, in this cloud world, speed—increased speed actually increases quality, resilience, availability, security and all of those things. It’s a question of learning how to use speed for those purposes.

    Shimel: Yeah. And that’s really—I mean, tongue in cheek, speed kills. What I was really trying to get at is, speed for speed’s sake alone is, you know, speed has to be wielded—with great power comes great responsibility, right?

    Schwartz: [Laughter] Yes. You have to achieve the speed for competitive reasons and for business model reasons, as I was saying before. So, it’s not really an option, but you do, at the same time, have to learn how to use that speed as a way to reduce risks and improve the quality of what you’re offering.

    Shimel: Exactly, exactly. So, what’s the reception been, Marc? What kind of feedback have you been getting from people?

    Schwartz: Well, the book was just published a couple of weeks ago, really. Where are we? Yeah, May 14th was the publication date, so a couple of weeks. And people seem to be enjoying it. I was a little bit playful in writing the book, and I think there are some aspects of it that are entertaining people, and that makes me feel very good.

    But from the feedback that I’ve been getting, people are seeing it as the successor to that previous book, just as I had hoped. You know, this is the way of looking at a similar message, but very much from the point of view of non-IT business executives. You know, how should the CFO be thinking about the new world, the new digital world, how should a CEO be thinking about it, how should the board of directors be thinking about it? And I’m very happy that people see it as valuable on that front, and a lot of people are saying, “Well, I’m gonna have my entire executive team read this, and it’s gonna stimulate some great discussions,” so I’m very happy about that.

    Shimel: That’s fantastic, great stuff. Let me bring in another aspect of it and get your thoughts on it, Marc. You know, we’ve heard a lot over the last, I’ve heard it maybe over the last year or 18 months—DevXOps, right? We have DevSecOps, DevBusOps, DevHROps—DevWhateverOps, right? DevXOps. And I think there’s a little bit of a reverse equation, here. Business leaders have to be more involved in IT and have to learn how to harness IT to further their businesses’ goals and delight customers, as you say, right?

    At the same time, we can take lessons from IT and things we’ve learned in IT with things like DevOps but not only DevOps. But IT has had, in a relatively short period of time, had a rather torturous road of self-improvement and of learning new things and evolving to things like DevOps that we see. What can businesses do—not harnessing IT, per se, but maybe saving some idiot taxes?

    Schwartz: [Laughter]

    Shimel: You know, from mistakes and lessons learned from IT and apply them to general business?

    Schwartz: Yeah. I think—I also joke about DevOps, DevSecOps, DevSecBizOps, DevSecFinBizOps—you know? You can keep adding to that.

    The real point is cross functional teams, right? DevOps meant we’re gonna have a cross functional team that has dev skills and ops skills, and at some point we realize that that set of skills is not quite enough, they also need to have security skills and you can keep adding to that infinitely, because the bottom line is that functional silos don’t work very well in a fast moving environment like we have in the digital world today. Functional silos slow down your response, they slow down your ability to innovate and grasp new opportunities and respond to change and things like that.

    So, that’s really what was behind the DevOps, DevXOps concept. And I think businesses find this, in general, that when you have functional silos and they operate as silos, you introduce waiting time when you pass things from one silo to another. You reduce innovation because each silo thinks of itself as having its own responsibility instead of joint responsibility for results.

    So, the lesson that I think everybody can take away from what’s happened in IT is that, to respond quickly in an environment where you need to respond quickly, you have to do away with silos and instead focus on cross-functional teams that [Background noise] objective. At least, that’s my biggest takeaway.

    Shimel: Sure, sure. [Background noise] I’m sorry, my machine’s—uh oh, here we go. You know, I’m on my, I’m not gonna give you the brand of the surface I’m on. There’s only one company that makes surfaces.

    Schwartz: [Laughter]

    Shimel: It’s on a roll of reminders.

    Schwartz: Excellent sound effects.

    Shimel: It doesn’t shut up, here. Look at this, this is—

    Schwartz: That’s okay, we could use some background music.

    Shimel: Yeah, I guess so. It’s happening—I don’t know if I like the rhythm, but anyway. [Laughter] So, Marc, a good question is—look, you’re globetrotting around the world evangelizing your AWS role and everything. And yet, you know, over the last, let’s say, three years, four years, you know, this is the third book, actually, isn’t it?

    Schwartz: Yeah. It’s the third one, and I’ve started to work on a fourth.

    Shimel: Can you give us a sneak preview of the fourth, or it’s too premature yet?

    Schwartz: Well, it is too premature. It can go in lots of different directions, but I can tell you what I’m thinking a lot about right now, which is bureaucracy and how to overcome it on the one hand, but even more than that, I think you can harness it in many ways, if you are trying to become a digital organization.

    And, you know, I think that fulfills my role as an iconoclast. I think bureaucracy is one of those words that people have a very strong negative reaction to. But, of course, in my role before AWS as a government CIO, I, of course, witnessed, experienced a lot of bureaucracy and developed strategies for coping with it that I think would be useful to a wide audience. So, I think I’ll probably write something that has to do with that.

    Shimel: Okay, pretty cool. And you know what? We mentioned “A Seat at the Table” and, you know, there’s nothing like your first book, but I feel amiss if we shouldn’t also mention the title of the second book, right, and that is “The Art of Business Value,” right?

    Schwartz: Yeah. “The Art of Business Value” was sort of my initial train of thought. You know, I said to myself, we’re talking a lot about business value and how important it is to guide what you do in the IT world by delivering business value and how you should make prioritization decisions by business value, and it occurred to me that nobody was really talking about what that meant, you know? What is business value, exactly?

    And when I looked into it, I realized that people were not really interpreting it, in many cases, in the best way, and that if you thought a little bit more deeply about that, it would change the way that you practiced IT.

    So, that was what drove that first book, and in that book, I introduced the question of what does a CIO have to do with figuring out what business value is? How does a CIO make sure that he or she is delivering business value? And I realized that that was a good topic for a second book, actually. [Laughter] Something that I really needed to dive more deeply into. So, that’s what generated “A Seat at the Table.”

    And then, as I said before, once I had written “A Seat at the Table,” it was sort of clear to me what the next thing had to be. It had to be the book that I hope will speak to non-IT business leaders. So, that explains the sequence of the three books in my head.

    Shimel: Very cool. So, Marc, is there a tour going on with the book? Are you out speaking—I mean, are you gonna be, for instance, at DOES: London, coming up?

    Schwartz: I will be there. I speak at a lot of conferences in my role with AWS, and so, I’m on a permanent tour, essentially. [Laughter] I speak all over the world, and of course, I write blog posts and I’ll be writing some more books. And it all ties together with my role at AWS, where I’m part of a team that’s trying to lead enterprise executives into the future. You know, here’s the way that we see things developing, here’s how you can take advantage of what’s going on with the cloud and with DevOps.

    And so, I don’t have a speaking tour specifically about my book, but a lot of the topics that the book touches are also the topics I talk about for AWS.

    Shimel: Great. Great, great, great. Marc, we’re about out of time. We mentioned you can get the book on Amazon. Up on devopsy.kinsta.cloud, I think we have a link to a, I don’t know if it’s the first chapter or an excerpt of the book. We’ll put that in the show notes.

    Look, man—first of all, congratulations on what sounds like another great book. I’m actually, I’m gonna be on the road a whole bunch in June, so, I’m gonna have a chance to catch up on my reading on planes and stuff, so I’ll get a chance to read this one. And then maybe we can circle back, maybe at the end of June in London, and we can talk a little bit more in depth about it.

    Schwartz: Uh huh. Sounds great.

    Shimel: Great. Hey, Marc Schwartz—iconoclast, CIO, or iconoclastic CIO as well as multiple award winning author, a real DevOps expert. His newest book, “War, Peace & IT,” you can find out more, get an excerpt from it on devopsy.kinsta.cloud, you can get it on Amazon or any number of good quality book sites.

    Hey, Marc, congratulations, and thanks for being our guest on DevOps Chat.

    Schwartz: Thank you very much.

    Shimel: Alright. Enjoy your day and we’ll be in touch.

    Schwartz: Thanks.

    Shimel: Alrighty. Bye bye. This is Alan Shimel for DevOps Chat and devopsy.kinsta.cloud. Have a great day.

    — Alan Shimel

  • CloudBees’ Acquisition of Rollout: The CEOs’ View

    CloudBees’ Acquisition of Rollout: The CEOs’ View

    As Mike Vizard reported yesterday, CloudBees, as part of its mission to build “the world’s first end-to-end automated software delivery system,” announced another acquisition: Rollout, a developer of a feature flag application that allows for simplified testing of new modules within an application.

    Not to repeat the gist of Vizard’s article; you can read it for yourself. But this continues what has become something of an acquisition tear by CloudBees. The company has acquired CodeShip and Electric Cloud, among others, while becoming one of the founding members of the new Continuous Delivery Foundation (CDF), under the Linux Foundation and a sister foundation to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) and the Cloud Foundry Foundation. The CDF is now managing the Jenkins project, as well as Jenkins X, Spinnaker and Tekton.

    CloudBees’ Mission

    Make no mistake: These acquisitions, along with the CDF formation, represent a major change for CloudBees. The team there is clearly trying to separate from the pack of “end-to-end” DevOps contenders. CloudBees CEO Sacha Labourey is pushing hard to raise CloudBees above the noise and the rest of the market. The company announced a $62 million round of financing about a year ago.

    You don’t have to be Warren Buffet to see that CloudBees sees an opportunity here. The company is driving toward achieving scale in product and revenue on the path to some sort of liquidity event (perhaps an IPO?) or market leading opportunity.

    For now, though, back to the Rollout acquisition. I had the chance to sit down with Labourey and the CEO and founder of Rollout, Erez Rusovsky. We discussed what Rollout does, its history and how it will fit into the CloudBees product portfolio.

    It is always great to interview a founder about his company being acquired. What a tremendous feeling of accomplishment to found and build a company, and have another entity value it so much that you are willing to sell it to them. This goes so far beyond validation.

    Congrats to Erez and the whole Rollout team and, of course, congratulations to Sacha, KK and the rest of the CloudBees team. This seems like a perfect fit.

    In the meantime, here is my conversation with Sacha and Erez on the acquisition and more. Enjoy!

     

    — Alan Shimel

  • True Digital Adoption Empowers Humans

    True Digital Adoption Empowers Humans

    True Digital Adoption empowers humans to use use technology which is almost exclusively digital. What are the killer apps that you use all the time? OK, of those handful (for most of you) of apps, how well do you know them?  What percentage of the feature set do you really use? Making better use of the apps we already own is a key factor in transformation.

    Gartner calls this category Digital Adoption Solutions (DAS). According to Gartner, “They assist employees with complex business processes, tasks infrequently performed and change management activities.”  One of the leaders in this emerging category is Walkme.

    Walkme as a Digital Adoption Solution

    I was introduced to Walkme at a recent Insight Ignite event in Iceland. I saw a presentation from Amir Farhi of Walkme. He showed us a demo of how Walkme overlaid on an organization’s Salesforce install made it really easy to use with features that you may not be familiar with. Instantly, digital adoption became real for me.

    Salesforce is, of course, a hugely popular application and in many cases this is a poster child for why digital adoption in general and Walkme in particular is a killer app in and of itself. But Walkme doesn’t end with Salesforce. You can use Walkme on just about any app, both public and your own private apps.  It is a game changer and the bigger your enterprise, the bigger the payoff in using Walkme for digital adoption.

    I invited Amir to join me on a video for Digital Anarchist to discuss digital adoption and show us a demo of Walkme. I am happy to share this with you below. Have a look and listen. I think you will agree that Walkme is one of those rare solutions that is so elementally easy to appreciate, your reaction will be, “Why didn’t I think of this?”

    Here is my conversation with Amir on digital adoption:

    — Alan Shimel

  • DevOps Chat: Serverless Intelligence With Lumigo’s Aviad Mor

    DevOps Chat: Serverless Intelligence With Lumigo’s Aviad Mor

    Lumigo finds itself in the middle of one of the biggest waves in infrastructure deployment today, serverless. This is no accident, the company was started about a year ago with the mission of providing a serverless intelligence platform.

    The founders are ex-Checkpoint folks who saw the need for a best practices based platform to help deploy serverless payloads (apps) across different public cloud providers including AWS Lamdba, Azure and Google Cloud.

    In this DevOps Chat we spoke with Aviad Mor, CTO, co-founder of Lumigo about the company and the serverless market. As usual, the streaming audio is immediately below, followed by the transcript of our conversation.

    Transcript

    Alan Shimel: Hey, everyone, this is Alan Shimel, devopsy.kinsta.cloud, Security Boulevard, Container Journal and you’re listening to another DevOps Chat. Today’s guest on DevOps Chat is Aviad Mor, who’s the CTO/Co-founder of a company called Lumigo?

    Aviad Mor: Right, right.

    Shimel: Okay. Aviad, welcome!

    Mor: Hi, Alan. I’m very excited to be here on your podcast today.

    Shimel: We’re excited to have you here. So, Aviad, let’s start off with this. I don’t think a lot of people—and maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think a lot of people in our audience are quite familiar with Lumigo yet. Give us the background. What’s the company about?

    Lumigo Aviad Mor
    Aviad Mor, Lumigo

    Mor: Okay, sure. I’d be very happy to. So, Lumigo is a startup. We were founded about a year ago, and we’re in the serverless domain. We’re a company that’s focusing on serverless monitoring and troubleshooting, and what we’re doing is, we’re giving customers the ability to see their system, understand what’s happening, and in general, allow them to adopt serverless.

    Shimel: Absolutely. And of course, you know, serverless is really one of the hot—I mean, it’s a buzz word and it’s overhyped and everything else, but it really is one of the hot technologies for, you know, next gen infrastructure as we continue to move away from just pure Infrastructure as a Service to Platform as a Service and now serverless to host your distributed applications.

    I think—you know, Aviad, we live in a bubble where we say serverless, people know what we’re talking about, right?

    Mor:  [Laughter]

    Shimel: But we sometimes need to remember that—forget non-IT people. They think serverless and they must think it’s some kinda black magic. But even people who maybe aren’t up on cloud architecture and some of the latest containerization and application hosting, they’re not 100 percent sure what serverless is.

    For many people, it’s almost synonymous, now, with Lambda, right, with AWS’ Lambda platform.

    Mor: Right, right.

    Shimel: You know, I’m sure—go ahead.

    Mor: Right. So, Lambda, I think, is—it’s in the heart of serverless. AWS, when they announced Lambda about four or five years ago, that was the beginning of the serverless movement. And what Lambda is, is a function as a service. It’s fast. And that allows us to see—it allows the users to run their compute, run specific parts of their code without having to take care of any server, any container. They just write their code, upload it to the cloud provider, and decide what’s the trigger for that code.

    Shimel: Yeah.

    Mor: So, they can run it without any issues, without having to install anything, without having to update when there’s any security issues. But I want to say something—I think that Lambda and Function as a Service, that’s more of the technical part. I think that, in many ways, serverless is a way of thinking. Because serverless goes with the whole ecosystem around it. You have a database which is serverless and API gateways and, for example, file storage which is also serverless. And that’s important, because when you want to build a full architecture in the cloud, a full application, you can’t only use functions. You need to use all of those different parts together and you now can have a full architecture, which is composed of only things that you did not install, okay?

    Shimel: Mm-hmm.

    Mor: So, I think the main part of serverless is that the servers are somebody else’s problem. For example, AWS or Google or Microsoft, whichever cloud you’re running on.

    Shimel: Sure. Absolutely, and that is the piece of it, right? Where, with cloud, the infrastructure was someone else’s—so, you’re talking to someone who was in the hosting and infrastructure business in the dot com days, right? And we used to sell what we call power, ping, and pipe, right? And then, with cloud, you didn’t have to—you didn’t sell power, ping, and pipe. You provided that, people didn’t really care, and they just built on top of the hypervisor.

    Now, we’re seeing, they don’t even care all the way even through the OS at some point, right? They’re just putting it on—they’re just uploading their application.

    You know, we mentioned AWS Lambda, but you also mentioned Microsoft and Google cloud, and though I think AWS, like in much of cloud, is probably the leading player—not probably, is the leading player in serverless—you know, Microsoft and Google have some very fine offerings as well.

    Mor: Right, right.

    Shimel: I wonder what you’re seeing in the market. So, you deal with it much more than I.

    Mor: Right. So, you know, when we’re looking at our customers, we see that AWS is the clear leader. I think the numbers are somewhere around 60 or 70 percent in serverless. But Google and Microsoft Azure, they’re giving a real fight. And they keep on putting forward innovation and they’re giving sometimes even things that you don’t have in AWS.

    [su_pullquote align=”left” class=”do_blockquote”]I think that, in many ways, serverless is a way of thinking.[/su_pullquote]So, I think that, as we progress over time, we’ll see more and more users in Microsoft and in Google. Although today, as you said, most of the people you talk to, they’re using AWS and a lot of times the people who are using Microsoft and Google are people who are already using it for other things in the cloud.

    Shimel: Right.

    Mor: So, it’s easier for them to add the serverless in the same cloud.

    Shimel: Let me ask you a question—what about serverless not in the cloud? If you wanna call it provide serverless, on prem serverless—are you seeing anything with that?

    Mor: Right, yes. So, we are seeing that. Very little, I must say. Usually, it’s open source—so, you have, for example, OpenWhisk and others. We see that usually in places where they can’t run in the public cloud.

    So, just a simple example of that would be the defense forces where they don’t want to run on the public cloud, they run them themselves. But usually, it is in the public, because I think the main thing in serverless is having somebody else taking care of everything for you.

    So, at the end of the day, if you’re still building the infrastructure and running open source, it’s great, but you’re still very much aware of how many servers you have, how to scale them, and any issues that you need to update manually.

    So, I think the public cloud here is a clear leader.

    Shimel: Sure. Okay enough about serverless. Well, we’re gonna talk more about serverless, but let’s now talk a little bit about Lumigo, right, and what it is you guys do for people who are hosting apps in a serverless environment.

    I looked at it, and to me, a little bit of APN for serverless, if you will. But there’s also sort of a pre-deployment best practices approach to—so you can check before you deploy. Are you using best practices? Is this the right way to do it? And then, post-deployment monitoring and alerting as well. Fair?

    Mor: Yes. So, I think that in general, you got it. I think that APN won’t be completely wrong. But we do have, in serverless, new challenges, right? It’s a new technology, it offers amazing things, but at the end of the day, it’s new, and it has its own challenges.

    And one of the major challenges is that serverless is distributed by its very nature. So, when you go serverless, you have a lot of different parts, microservices, and each one of them, it’s very easy to deploy and see exactly how it’s doing. But if you’re, for example, the DevOps, who is in charge of this operation, you want to see how the whole system is working together. You want to see how they’re all connected.

    And that’s becoming very hard in the serverless world, and that’s why you need something like Lumigo to map everything for you, to show you a visualization of your environment, and that way you can see where you have issues where you’re spending a lot of money, maybe, that’s one point that we’ll talk about. And like you said, you were completely right—sometimes you can catch these things before you deploy them. Serverless comes with a lot of small things, skill sets that I think developers will have over time. But right now, we can help them save money and save time just by looking at the Lambdas right before they deploy them and tell them how they can make it better.

    Shimel: Fair enough. So, what about—you know, I just can’t help but think, not everyone’s gonna move their entire infrastructure to serverless, right? So, for the foreseeable future, you’re gonna have sort of a hybrid, the same way we do with cloud, frankly, right? It’s a hybrid cloud environment, you have hybrid applications environment. Some of my applications might be in a serverless environment, some aren’t in a serverless environment, et cetera.

    How do—you know, real world examples, companies have both—what do they, how do they, can Lumigo help them across the board, or does Lumigo them integrate into something else, or do we just need different tools and different views into the different ways we’re hosting our applications.

    Mor: Alan, I think that’s a great question. We started out focusing on serverless because we saw that’s where the greatest pain point is. But the more we’re seeing customers using serverless, some of them are, let’s call it, pure environments of only serverless. But it’s also very common to have them both, to have a hybrid environment where you have both, for example, Kubernetes and serverless.

    [su_pullquote align=”right” class=”do_blockquote”]We started out focusing on serverless because we saw that’s where the greatest pain point is.[/su_pullquote]
    And it does make sense, because it’s not one size fits all. Some tasks are better run by containers. For example, long running tasks that take hours, and some tasks are much better with the serverless; for example, event based or answering quick APIs. So, we see hybrid solutions, and that’s why we’re now starting to give our own solution for distributed tracing. Because when you’re looking at your environment, it just makes sense that you want to see them all in one tool. You want to see how they’re all interconnected.

    So, now, we’re starting to look at containers and Kubernetes and see how they’re all working together. So, now if, for example, you have a Lambda that has a failure in it, you can see the exact chain of events that led to that failure, and it doesn’t matter if what called that Lambda was another Lambda or maybe a container, it doesn’t matter. You can see and go through all of those different calls and fix and find the root cause as quickly as possible.

    Shimel: Excellent. Aviad, as I mentioned to you, the time goes quick. This is another area I wanted to hit on, and that’s your personal journey. You know, whenever I’m lucky enough to have a co-founder or a CTO kind of person on the show, I always like—because there’s people out there listening that are just starting in their careers or they wanna get into this, or maybe they’ve worked in companies, but they aspire or dream to start their own, to found a company.

    Give your audience a little bit about your personal background and how you got here.

    Mor: [Laughter] Well, sure, sure. I’ve worked most of my career in Checkpoint, which is a big company, and actually in Israel, it’s one of the biggest cyber security—actually, in the whole world, it’s one of the biggest cyber security companies.

    And after many years there, I decided to make the move. I have to admit, on one hand, it was always a dream to do that, always a dream to do something of my own, something small. On the other hand, it wasn’t easy, and I got the opportunity to do it with ________, who wasn’t only a colleague, he was also a very, very good friend, which, we knew that we would have to work together.

    But I’ll give you an example of one of the issues. People, you know, came up to me and said, “Best of luck, but you know, you’re too old. You’re already 38, you have a wife and three daughters. You won’t be able to do this. This is only a young player’s game.”

    Shimel: Mm-hmm.

    Mor: But, you know, it’s like—it’s a burning desire. You know that you have to do this, and after I got into it, first of all, of course, I got my family’s blessing, because without that, without my wife doing that, it wouldn’t be possible.

    And then I also was very happy to see that the experience that I already gained does have some meaning. It’s not only the fact that you’re [Laughter] I’m saying old, like they called me, but it does have meaning that you have experience and you know how to work with customers and work in a big enterprise. And at the end of the day, it’s a great combination.

    So, now, when I look at it, it’s very hard work. I don’t see my daughters as much as I would want to, but I know it’s one of the best decisions I made in my life. And I can tell you that one of the most exciting things is to see in production, in customers’ production, something that Erez and myself envisioned, and it was on a PowerPoint, like, a year ago. And now it’s running and helping actual customers? That’s a great feeling, it truly is.

    Shimel: I know, it’s very fulfilling—look, I’ve been there. And you wanna know the truth, 38 is not that old for a startup. Because, through startup to startup, I’m trying to think back. I started my first company—I was maybe 33, actually, 34. But I do think that you need a certain amount of experience, right?

    Now, there are some people who tell you that working in a culture like Checkpoint, as big as it is, is still rather entrepreneurial, right, versus working in IBM or one of these really big companies. And so—and also, the whole Israeli tech scene. It’s a startup country, and I think that kinda helps, too.

    But, you know, you mentioned something that I think people don’t give founders enough credit for, which is—it’s not easy, and you spend a lot of nights away from your family and a lot of hard hours and weekends and business trips and, you know, doing what you gotta do. Where, a lot of people who work at jobs, at the end of the day, they go home with a clear head, right? And so, it is that.

    Last topic I want to hit before we—because we are, we’re probably in overtime right now, Aviad, but I want you to talk about the role of Kubernetes in serverless. I’m going to KubeCon after we finish this podcast, and you know, they seem to be linked, but not linked, right? [Laughter] What’s your take on that?

    Mor: Mm-hmm. I think that, at the end, they’re linked in two ways. I think that we have to remember, although the cloud provider is the one doing it, but serverless functions are running on containers, right? So, they’re probably running on Kubernetes or something similar to it. That’s at the infrastructure level, although you, as a developer, really don’t care about that.

    But the other part, I think that as serverless grows, and we are seeing it growing, it won’t replace Kubernetes. It will be alongside of it, and I think that the future technology stack will be a combination of serverless things like Kubernetes and SaaS, right? All of those together will give each and every company the best solution they can get.

    Shimel: Excellent. Aviad Mor, CTO, Co-founder, Lumigo—thanks for being our guest on this DevOps Chat.

    Mor: Alan, thank you so much. It was a real pleasure.

    Shimel: Alrighty. This is Alan Shimel for MediaOps, devopsy.kinsta.cloud, Security Boulevard, Container Journal—you’ve just listened to another DevOps Chat. Have a great day, everyone.

    — Alan Shimel

  • DevOps Chat: We Are Devo, With Walter Scott

    DevOps Chat: We Are Devo, With Walter Scott

    If you have massive amounts of data, Devo wants to help. The Madrid-based company specializes in the handling and processing of massive amounts of data.

    In this DevOps Chat we spoke with Devo CEO Walter Scott about the use cases for Devo in a data-crazy world. Walter is a seasoned CEO in the tech sector. He knows a problem when he sees it and he thinks Devo is the answer. Have a listen to why and check out Devo at devo.com.

    As usual, the streaming audio is immediately below, followed by the transcript of our conversation. Enjoy!

    Transcript

    Alan Shimel: Hey everyone, this is Alan Shimel, devopsy.kinsta.cloud. You’re listening to another DevOps Chat. Really happy to have a new company, a new friend, joining us on DevOps Chat today. I have Walter Scott, CEO of Devo. Walter, welcome to DevOps Chat.

    Walter Scott: Thanks, Alan.

    Shimel: So, Walter, you and I met recently in Iceland, of all places, at a Insight IGNITE event that really kinda focused on DevOps, cloud, cybersecurity, if you will, the topics, but it was my first exposure to Devo. I don’t know if our audience is familiar with Devo. Why don’t you–give us the foundation, man. “We are Devo.” What are you guys? What do you do?

    Scott: Well, Devo is a data analytics platform that’s the next gen of technology, that provides a data fabric to allow our customers to take all of the noise that exists in the machines and petabytes, and petabytes of data coming in, for them to really start getting signals so that they can start their automation or their AI or their machine learning process, to make their companies more efficient; to be able to have them act more quickly; as well as to be able to get the people who use our platform, to get them the time back that they spend in managing the underlying data platform and allowing them to add the value to drive IT, to drive that value back to the business.

    Shimel: Excellent. And, you know, Walter, one of the things that impressed me with Devo was this wasn’t your sorta typical Silicon Valley story—a couple of wiz kids come up with a PowerPoint business plan and get funded via VCs, pre-revenue, pre-product even. Devo—the underlying technology here, the company’s been around a while and it’s not a Silicon Valley company, right?

    Scott: That is correct.

    Shimel: Give us a little background on that.

    Scott: Well, you know, over my six stints of being a CEO, I’ve never really run an American-based company. There’s great IT being built all over the world. I’ve done them from Malta to Scotland, Germany to Armenia to now with us here in Madrid, is where the company started. And we had a not Silicon Valley startup, but it was five guys—or four guys and a girl or woman—and started off the product in a research key, to really build something special and change the market because the bank that they worked for had to completely change the way they do business.

    And over the course of three years in research and we finally launched a product in 2014 and have been three-figure type growth every single year, since the date of the company being founded, ’cause it’s such a large market. And it’s really accelerating because of what we’re seeing happening with businesses and trying to get ahead of everything from getting arbitrage out of supply chain to solving their security problems, just to start with basic log management and monitoring to consolidate tools and increase agility.

    Shimel: Sure. So, Walter, you were—as you alluded to, this is your sixth or seventh startup where you’ve come in as CEO and had some tremendous success. And, look, not everyone is a success, right? That’s the mantra in business, but you keep plugging. When we look at Devo—and you and I spoke a little bit about this in Iceland, but so much of what we see as, quote unquote, “AI” today is really machine learning. And so much of machine learning is based, really, on data, right? You’re only as good as your data. In order to find patterns, you have to have enough data to analyze it and make actionable kinda calls out of it.

    But this is not a new problem and there’ve been other solutions. What makes Devo’s solution—I don’t know if you use the term “next-gen” or “new-gen” or something like that, but what makes Devo’s solution different?

    Scott: Well, you know, this has been going around a long, long time and you’ve heard me say, in the absence of data, the machine can’t learn. And I go back, all the way back, to the Walmart days in the ’80s, when they built—I would argue … them as the first person to really take the competitive advantage, coming from their data warehouse, right? And —

    Shimel: I agree.

    Scott: —They actually had the line, they could tell your daughter’s pregnant before you could by looking at the data. Well, today, that’s become necessary, but, over the last 10 years, it’s really—what’s happened with the cloud is being able to get that data manageable. I don’t like the term “AI.” I like more “augmented intelligence” because we’re not at the place—or even narrow AI ’cause I think it can solve very specific business problems that people might have. We have one customer that needed to actually build some ML and machine learning to detect what a bot was, were hitting their site, because, when they launched a new product, the bots would come in and sell it all in the secondary market. They wanted that brand loyalty to go to the end users.

    Or we have another customer that has a bunch of IoT devices integrated into their sporting equipment, where they’re trying to figure out if somebody’s gonna get hurt and using machine learning to be able to define what is that case, in terms of repetitive hits, but they need that data over long scales. And just the data science is actually making that possible. It could be done in the past; the problem was it just wasn’t cost-efficient enough to do it.

    We have customers that are taking literally over a trillion events a day to try to—and building machine learning models to understand which customers may leave their environment, based upon dropped calls or poor support integration. And it’s not just having that one set of data; it’s about having hundreds of different sets of data to help prove those hypotheses, to get those more and more efficient. And the data scientists are spending 70% to 80% of their time getting their arms around the data. We take that problem away from them and allow them to have—to solve that other 80% now, they can put in training their models and getting data to make them more and more efficient.

    Shimel: Excellent. Great answer. Hey, you know, Walter, you and I, this is neither one of our first rodeos. And, when I look at your job, your mission over there, at Devo, one of the things that I guess it’s a double-edged sword ’cause it presents so many opportunities, but, at the same time, there’s an axiom in business—“Put all your wood behind one arrow,” right? There are so many use cases for what you can do here, right? There’s the cybersecurity case, right? Where, “Look, man, we need this data. We need to be logging everything. We need to find if we’re under attack, where the attack’s coming from, what’s happening?,” right? So there’s that. And one can spin up an entire company around just using this kind of technology in cyber.

    You alluded to a few other use cases, right? That had nothing to do with cybersecurity. Better business intelligence. Understanding your customers better. Understanding your product better. There’s only so many targets, though, that you can go after, right? Without a tremendous—you know, you wanna build an IBM kind of force or something or a Dell force, that’s a whole different story. So how do you—Walter, as the CEO, how do you prioritize? What are the best use cases for this technology? What are the right markets for us to pursue?

    Scott: Well, what you say no to is just as important as what you say yes to, in a business.

    Shimel: Yep.

    Scott: And, right now, we are very, very focused in the Americas, as well as in western Europe, right? So we’ve been able to say no to Asia for another year or two. Our value proposition is really about the biggest of the big—the telcos, the banks, the large retailers, people who’re looking at real scale that they’re trying to solve problems with. But the fact is, is where I see the market going over the next three years is more about consolidating the DevOps, the ITOps, the Network Ops, the SecOps. All of those are coming into one. And I’ve heard a couple of people start using the term “fusion center,” which is really helping them drive the business and stop pointing fingers and reducing that mean time to response.

    Well, every security product starts with the logs, right? And every IT monitoring product starts with the logs and the data. And the advantage of us being able to load in all of that relational data, which is about 20% of our data that’s in our systems, across our customer base, is things that is coming out of Xdata or data warehouses or relational or customer application type or weather data or threat hunting data that comes in, and being able to combine all of that. So, for us, it’s the larger customers or companies that have data at scales that we’d see in the global 1,000 and really looking at the people who understand that what Google, and Apple, and Facebook, and Netflix have done is taken a data-first approach to their business.

    And, when we look at customers that are forward seeing—that see forward into the market, they realize there are a whole new set of competitors and being able to ask what their real competitive advantage is in their business and the data that it takes for them to be able to do that, whether that’s a telco to figure out how to launch a 5G network because they have all the 4G, 3G and 2G data, whether it’s in their customer retention rates or net retention of “Can they get more dollars out of their customers each year?” to whether it be their manufacturing process and figuring out that arbitrage in the supply chain.

    So I think we are—because of the ease of use of our product, because it’s so easy to get data in, because we keep data in raw format. So you can have one set of data that’s very easy to get in and use it 100 times, not having to index it or reduce that data because it just makes it more efficient.

    But I see us, in the next couple of years, really focused on the security side of the equation. Looking at people who’re doing the transformation and the weight that it’s gonna take on their DevOps and CloudOps teams and being able to work closely with the network and the DevOps teams to be able to grow their business because the cost of becoming so great on having so many different tools, at different layers of your network, I say that the best and the brightest companies will take control of their own data, consolidate those tools so they have a better competitive advantage.

    Shimel: Good. Good. Good. Walter, I’m gonna throw a term at you and I want your opinion on it, “AIOps.” What do you—this is a term that we, here at devopsy.kinsta.cloud anyway, we see it rising with a bullet. And, like you—to me, there’s AIOps with a capital “A” and a capital “I” and it’s like Robby the Robot stuff that’s gonna make us live like The Jetsons, finally. And then there’s AI with a small “a” and a small “i,” like the real, functional, kinda down in the dirt–maybe it’s not as sexy, but it provides real change for us. AIOps is—man, everyone—what’s your story on AIOps? It reminds me of when cloud came out in 2005. What do you think?

    Scott: So let’s be very clear. AIOps is a term that’s been coined by Gartner. Out of the last 100 conversations I’ve had with CIOs, I’ve only heard it referenced once or twice. I think it’s more the vendors that are getting on it. And, when you look at it, log management is a big part of AIOps. You know, user behavior analytics is part of AIOps. The anomaly detection is part of AIOps, right? There’s seven or eight different components to that. I don’t think any vendor right now, in the world, really has defined themselves as an AIOps vendor. I think we’ve probably got three years, through help of M&A and deciding what that is, ’cause incident response or the service management is also there, so I think it’s gotta evolve.

    But, of the seven or eight different components, the monitoring, the dealing with events, the user behavior, the anomaly detection and the log management is there, which is where we focus. And I think the enterprise log management, I thought, five, six years ago, was solved, when we solved who all those vendors are, but now, with the complexity of the cloud, it isn’t solved at the scale customers need to do with it. We had solved router management; now, with SD-WAN, it’s a whole new market.

    Shimel: Yeah. You’re right. I mean, and it’s funny that things that–it’s kinda like the measles, right? We thought we cured measles and here we are back with measles. Walter, we’re both CEOs of companies and I don’t know how many people listening out there are CEOs—many of our listeners are kinda getting their fingernails dirty, practitioners as well as managers at large enterprise—what keeps you up at night about Devo? What do you worry most about, Walter?

    Scott: Well, I think part is we have to manage tens or hundreds of petabytes of data for our customers, right? And I think we have a very large team internally for security, to make sure that the data that we have is protected and we work very closely with Amazon and Google and Azure to make sure that we address that. And that’s something that you’re never gonna sleep well ’cause you have to be passionate about making sure that you protect your customers.

    We were on the phone literally an hour ago with a manufacturer that makes toys for children, and that was the question that’s keeping him up–he says, “I have 10-year-old boys and girls logging into my website. I have to protect that data, making sure in the things that we do with being able to obfuscate data at the row, in the column level, without having to duplicate it and our algorithms that are in there.”

    But my job, as a CEO, is to help people build careers. I’ve been very fortunate in my career and have had some very large exits in part of the business, but it’s making sure that the team around us continues to make sure that we handle all of the things, in dealing with our business and our main offices in Madrid. We also have a big office in Cambridge, Massachusetts, because I love the guys and women coming out of MIT, where we do a lot of hiring. But it’s mostly about the team and then making sure that we continue to have what I call a industry-abnormal or an anomaly in terms of net retention. And our goal is to help our customers continue to grow because it benefits us and wanting to make sure that we make it easier for them to be able to get more value because our mission is about making IT so that they can provide data to the business that is actionable.

    And my belief is is the CISO or the CIO that has control of that data, if they push it out to the business and say, “Hey, did you know that, on this particular case or when this happens, we’re losing customers or we’re gaining customers?” That data is 80% more likely to be leveraged than it is if the customer asks the business. So—

    Shimel: Nice.

    Scott:–I think it’s empowering the IT to accelerate value to the business and most of my nights are, well, we see this new customer is bringing in this type of a data, bringing in our data science teams to help think about use cases that we can drive more value from.

    Shimel: Excellent. So, Walter, as I mentioned to you before we started recording today, the good news and bad news about this audio format is it goes so darn quickly. And we blew past our time. So what we’ll do, though, is we’ll—secret’s out: you live down in Florida, too. We’re gonna need to get you down here and into our studio and let’s do a whole video on this. We’ll continue our conversation in a video format. But, for now, we’re gonna call a—have to pull the plug on this one. Walter Scott, CEO of Devo, thanks for being our guest today on DevOps Chat.

    Scott: Great, Alan. Thanks.

    Shimel: All right. Hey, this is Alan Shimel, devopsy.kinsta.cloud, and you’ve just listened to another DevOps Chat.

    — Alan Shimel