devopsy.kinsta.cloud

Tag: software development management

  • flox Unveils More Accessible Instance of Nix Framework

    flox Unveils More Accessible Instance of Nix Framework

    This week, flox launched a more opinionated implementation of the open source Nix framework that programmatically automates package management and system configuration.

    Fresh from raising an additional $16.5 million in funding, flox CEO Ron Efroni said the company will also make an enterprise edition of its namesake flox framework available later this year.

    The Nix framework has been available since 2003 and provides DevOps teams with a portable, fully isolated development, test and production environment along with a catalog and tools for managing software packages. There are more than 5,000 contributors to the platform, but Nix is based on a unique programming language that many DevOps teams have found challenging to master.

    The flox framework provides a higher layer of abstraction for invoking Nix, and provides a set of guardrails to make the framework more accessible to a wider range of DevOps teams, said Efroni.

    That approach will make it easier to share development environments and packages across teams, machines, individual developers and entire organizations. The framework also provides visibility into the software bill of materials (SBOM) for applications used in production environments to enable real-time vulnerability management and detection without scanning, noted Efroni. That capability makes it easier to discover dependencies spanning multiple architectures; many organizations today still try to track dependencies using spreadsheets and tools that don’t serve to make DevSecOps processes simpler to manage, he added.

    It’s not clear how many organizations are using Nix today, but Efroni said that as software development management continues to become more complex across multiple platforms and architectures, there is a clear need for a different approach to enabling portability at scale. The biggest obstacle is overcoming the psychological biases many DevOps teams have developed toward Nix over the last two decades, he noted. A more opinionated framework should reduce the overall fear factor associated with Nix, noted Efroni.

    Regardless of the frameworks employed, it’s become apparent that DevOps teams are struggling under the weight of all the code they must manage, much of it written in multiple programming languages. Many organizations that embraced DevOps early are now finding the platforms they deployed have become challenging to manage and maintain. As application environments become more complex, there is a need to modernize DevOps workflows. Less clear is whether those efforts might be focused on, for example, containers and serverless computing frameworks versus a framework such as flox that is designed to span multiple architectures and platforms.

    It might be a while before IT organizations develop a unified approach to application development and deployment, given all the preferences of individual development teams. However, with the rise of platform engineering, it’s apparent more organizations are trying to strike a balance between developer freedom and the need to reduce the total cost of DevOps. That cost continues to rise as additional software architectures and platforms are employed.

    In the meantime, flox plans to contribute to both Nix and its own more opinionated version of the framework in the hopes of one day making it easier to achieve that goal.

  • Software Development Management Drives Business Value

    Software Development Management Drives Business Value

    How much business value does your software group generate for your organization?

    That’s the existential question an international corporation’s software leader poses, kicking off the 2017 book “The Business Value of Software.” It’s also a topic we’ve all likely wrestled with from time to time. It’s the essence of the value we personally bring to the business through our daily actions.

    The problem is, value is hard to define and hard to measure. But, it’s easy to see how business value can seep away from software initiatives when software projects start to experience problems. 

    When production is delayed, and software releases don’t go out on time, sales will fall short of projections. When a release doesn’t satisfy customer needs in a specific market, negative user reviews will spike–and that could impact future sales. When market trends shift suddenly, and business unit leaders have no clear way to push the development team to add new features to the product, that’s a missed market opportunity.

    With every misstep, you’ve lost a certain amount of business value.

    Conceptually, every one of these situations is fixable. To an extent, some companies have adopted practices that can catch certain problems before they become unfixable. But, to a greater extent, the inability of software-driven companies to anticipate trends, flag problems, share information, iterate on solutions and learn from mistakes is costing them business.

    In this blog series, we’ve discussed how software delivery management (SDM) presents a framework for organizations to change the way they think about software and streamline delivery processes. SDM seeks to connect all aspects of the software delivery process to not only become more efficient but also drive toward a common goal of delivering maximum business value.

    The SDM model is built around four key pillars: ensuring everybody is working with common data; sharing insights and continuous learning across the organization; connecting processes to bring ideas to market; and enabling closer collaboration across software-related functions and teams to amplify value creation efforts. It emphasizes that software doesn’t have to go it alone–the whole organization is rallying around software and making it a top priority.

    How does an interconnected, collaborative, information-driven software organization create business value using SDM? Here are a few ways.

    Leaning on Analytics

    Rather than just using discrete build-test-deploy processes, make sure management, developers, marketers and engineers are all incorporating key analytical measures in their iteration processes. These stakeholders shouldn’t go on hunches–they should base their decisions, at least in part, on data. The data includes downloads, adoption figures, conversions, support requests and customer experience performance ratings. Armed with information, the organization will do a better job delivering the software customers want and are willing to pay for.

    Helping People Ask the Right Questions

    Developers are a prideful bunch. They want to build great software that users love to run. Without insight into business needs and user preferences, they’ll do their best with features and functionality. With data sharing and communications channels in place, they can ask questions like “Where is this feature being deployed?” or “Why will customers want a whole new interface?” Consequently, ops pros can ask, “Who pushed this new release to production and when?” VPs can ask whether the latest round of releases will be ready for the big marketing push to launch it. If you’re asking the right questions early enough in the process, you’re going to make better decisions and be doing a better job delivering on business goals.

    Being Nimble Enough to Change Quickly

    Organizations pride themselves by their ability to act in an agile manner. But, are they really set up to move on a dime? Say a well-researched release flops unexpectedly. Sales and support rapidly gather feedback that European users hate the color and APAC users hate the navigation path. Because all the stakeholders are aligned and ready to move, developers tweak the features, ops leaders juggle the release schedule, management relaunches with regional marketing campaigns, sales follows up with targeted incentives and developers watch for more user feedback that can be incorporated into future releases.

    Your company has worked hard to turn itself into a software-driven business. Using the principles of SDM, your business can drive business results to the next level. It can generate more sales. It can make unhappy customers happy. It can make happy customers even happier. It can improve its own responsiveness, up and down the organization. Most of all, it can use software to achieve its ultimate goal: to drive business value.