Tag: mobile security

  • Implementing Data-Driven DevSecOps

    Implementing Data-Driven DevSecOps

    Right now, the way DevSecOps is typically implemented doesn’t fit with the rapid and agile DevOps CI/CD pipeline at all. It’s like applying 19th-century firefighting methods to a modern forest fire.

    Back then, firefighters employed a “bucket brigade,” where they would form a queue and pass buckets from one hand to another to put out a blaze. No doubt, it’s a lot of work, but much of the effort is wasted. Water inevitably spills out of the buckets as they are handed from one person to the next and by the time the bucket is emptied into the fire, half the water is gone. And not only is so much effort wasted, it’s far too slow and ineffectual to combat the kind of wildfires we face today.

    Likewise, the largely manual methods of current DevSecOps initiatives are ineffectual in fighting the fires of digital threats and cyberattacks modern mobile apps face. Like a modern megafire, these threats and attacks are growing and changing every second, seeking new vectors to spark new attacks elsewhere. Traditional DevSecOps tools like code scanning and penetration testing identify vulnerabilities and then the security teams start the manual “bucket brigade” to add as much protection as they can against them before the app has to be released. But neither the threats nor the CI/CD process has paused. New features have been added that have created new vulnerabilities, and the threat landscape has evolved. It’s inefficient because pentesting can’t provide the kind of real-time data about attacks and threats that developers need to provide protection against current threats. The result is the release of vulnerable mobile apps. 

    A Data-Driven Process

    In business, the C-suite is working hard to transform their companies into data-driven organizations where decisions are made not on the basis of gut feelings or expert opinion, but rather on analysis of hard data. That same approach needs to be brought to security implementation for mobile applications.

    Additionally, the implementation of security into a mobile app needs to be automated. With so much of the CI/CD process already automated, security cannot lag behind.

    These two elements combined create data-driven DevSecOps. In this method, the development and security teams have a system of record that provides real-time cyberattack and cyberthreat information about apps in the field, which drives decisions the team makes about the protections that are most urgent and that must be included in the next build. 

    It’s now well within the realm of possibility for mobile app developers to gather near-real-time information on exactly the kinds of threats and vulnerabilities that their mobile apps are facing in the field. When combined with location, network and other kinds of data, developers can gain a granular understanding not only of the most common threats their apps experience, but also which threats are most prevalent in specific geographic regions. They can also proactively identify the rapidly mounting threats that will become an enormous problem in the near future.

    With this data in hand, development teams can make informed decisions about which protections they should prioritize in the next build to make the best use of their time and resources to provide maximum protection to their end users. 

    The Need for Automation

    But having data isn’t enough. Development teams need the ability to act quickly on the insights provided, and manual implementation methods are too slow and cumbersome to keep up with the rapidly changing threat landscape for mobile apps. Once the decision is made, a system must also exist to automate the incorporation of mobile app security, anti-fraud and anti-cheat protections from within the CI/CD pipeline, so that security implementation runs as smoothly as feature creation.

    The advantages of data-driven DevSecOps are many. First, publishers, developers and security teams can understand exactly what cybercriminals are doing against their own apps with real users. With this data and the wealth of other data that organizations can collect from their apps, they can determine which threats are the most pressing, which are rapidly emerging and even how they are distributed among different geographic regions—all of which is extremely valuable information when deciding which protections to build into the next release.

    Finally, once the app is released, teams can use the data they receive about threats and attacks to prove the effectiveness and value of each protection that was included. It’s important information not only for continuous improvement, but also to justify the value of data-driven DevSecOps to management and the C-suite.

    With data-driven DevSecOps, organizations can provide data, transparency and visibility around security to all stakeholders in the CI/CD process—all while making the incorporation of security far more efficient and effective, along with the real-time data to prove it.

  • COVID-19 Long Tail Budget Impact

    COVID-19 Long Tail Budget Impact

    Technology budgets have shifted dramatically since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recent study from online CIO networking and information hub, Pulse. The pandemic, and its resulting shutdown, will likely continue to have a substantial impact on technology budgets for some time.

    The initial budgetary impact was substantial. When COVID-19 first arrived, many technology budgets were frozen in place. Today, 23% of CIOs report that their budgets are still frozen with 49% reporting a decline in their technology budgets. Seventeen percent said that they expect to decrease their budgets by more than 10% in the next two months.

    Fortunately, it’s not all bad news. Many respondents, 24% of them, predict that within the next two months their budgets will rise, including 9% of respondents who believe their budgets will increase more than 10%. However, most CIOs (27%) say that their IT budget won’t change in the near future.

    “And an additional 6% anticipate their budget will become frozen in the next two months — though, on a positive note, this figure is down from 23% two months ago,” stated the report.

    Surprisingly, there hasn’t been a change in business-technology priorities over the past two months for 79% of respondents, while 21% said that they now have different priorities than from the beginning of the pandemic.

    The priorities of those surveyed include focusing on internal communication and collaboration tools (45%), mobile security (39%), customer communication and collaboration tools (37%), password management tools (28%), virtual private networks (28%), security awareness training (24%), remote desktop tools (23%), encrypted communication tools (23%), and data security tools (15%).

    “Many companies are going to allow (or require) employees to work from home after the pandemic, due to health concerns and reduced overhead. The fact that CIOs are investing in security and end-user technology — even though budgets are decreasing — indicates this,” said Brian Sampietro, CIO at  TGI Office Automation, in the report.

    For those organizations who changed their priorities, the new budget items include virtual private networks (36%), password management (32%), remote desktop tools (30%), data security tools (27%), encrypted communication tools (26%) and mobile security (21%).

    How are CIOs making decisions when it comes to technology purchases? The majority said peer recommendations (69%) and industry analysts (52%). However, social media and email fared poorly as influencers, at 23% and 20% respectively. CIOs are determining needs, according to the survey, based on both executive and end-user requests. Only 10% said they depend upon user requests alone, and only 21% said executives solely drive decisions. Interestingly, 35% of CIOs make decisions quickly: Within one week they said they will decide on the right tool to acquire. The rest said they take more than a month (26%) or within four weeks (39%).

    When it comes to layoffs, there are still rough patches ahead, as a sizable number of organizations still have layoffs on the planning table. While 48% of organizations have maintained their headcount through the COVID-19 crises, 40% do plan to cut staff sizes in the next six months, with 25% not sure if they will cut staffs.