Tag: IT leadership

  • What DevOps Leadership Should Look Like

    What DevOps Leadership Should Look Like

    Implementing DevOps has become a major focus, but the practice’s attempt to provide organizational support and streamline production systems simultaneously leaves developers with no clear hierarchical structure. We know we need DevOps and we know it helps, but we also know that without proper leadership or structure, it can be misunderstood and undervalued. To build a strong collaborative culture, DevOps leadership, like most other leadership roles, requires a different type of skillset—a skillset that isn’t always prioritized in software development. The ability to understand programming languages, to be versatile and be attentive to detail will take a developer far in their career, but once they’re in a management position, what is needed to be an effective DevOps leader?

    First, what does an effective DevOps leader look like? To start, they need to lead. But to lead a DevOps team, it’s important to not only understand development—including reasonable goals and how to accomplish challenging tasks—but a DevOps leader needs to be able to create an environment that fosters collaboration between teams.

    This is why a DevOps culture is a core value for any high-performing DevOps team. This is due to the cross-functional nature of the practice. The stages of the DevOps cycle (plan, build, test, deploy and manage) rely on different teams with different skill sets.

    Build a Culture Of Ownership and Teamwork

    To effectively collaborate, a strong cross-functional culture of ownership, teamwork, intensity and smart application is needed.

    Clarity can transform a team, and it starts with ownership. Ownership is essential for cross-functional DevOps teams to understand their roles and what they are responsible for. In order for clarity to exist, leaders need to provide clear direction and guidance. It is a leader’s responsibility to set realistic goals and offer support. Group trust is built when a team has a common goal and clear roles and responsibilities are identified.

    Ownership is the foundation of teamwork, and with it, team members can see their individual contributions to a project and can celebrate their successes together. This teamwork then breeds collaboration, improved performance and a cohesive dynamic within the team’s culture.

    Lead With Strategic Intensity and Smart Application

    A DevOps leader can empower their team through ownership and teamwork, but we can’t forget the value of knowing the right level of intensity for a project. Leaders need to understand a situation, the context and how to approach it strategically to avoid burnout and bitterness. They must know when to apply intense sprints and when to pull back and move resources—a leader must know how to play smart with the resources they have.

    Use Soft Skills

    People management skills can be overlooked in a lot of leadership positions. For example, we might see it when a startup chooses a CTO or an engineering lead position based on seniority or developer skills without regard for their ability to actually manage people or their desire to be in such a position. Often, the person in charge of a DevOps team is given this role because of their previous development accomplishments, but they lack the necessary soft skills of communication, conflict management and/or teamwork. Using the four principles above can help accelerate the foundation of culture as well as help compensate for a leader’s lack of soft skills

    DevOps leaders need soft skills. Soft skills include the ability to think critically and project manage while having enough emotional intelligence to inspire, motivate and retain a team of smart engineers. Every leader needs to be able to see their team’s strengths and weaknesses, listen and influence and further develop their members to succeed. The challenge for this role is that, to be successful, it takes both technical expertise and soft skills and knowing how to balance the two.

    Unfortunately, soft skills haven’t been prioritized in the training and career development of most software engineers. Only recently have soft skills been seen as a differentiator in the engineer hiring process or seen as a value-add to an organization. For years, technical skills took precedence and we ignored the areas that would take a software engineer to the next level – the soft skills that will lead to leadership. But it’s a bigger problem; employers say most college grads aren’t learning these soft skills in school.

    Remember the Not-so-Secret Sauce

    Soft skills empower a leader to thrive both within a DevOps team and in collaboration with other departments. The ability to work across teams can exponentially improve business operations. A strong DevOps leader can offer solutions and problem solve for internal issues and customer-facing problems. They are able to bring DevOps into new areas of the company in a strategic and effective way. Collaboration requires working with others, seeing the bigger problem, understanding the business goals and using soft skills to get things done.

    It’s the not-so-secret sauce that makes all the difference when running a powerful DevOps team. A culture of collaboration starts with the leader. A leader’s relationship skills can increase the likelihood of bigger budgets, more tools and recognition. DevOps leaders can build a strong team by leveraging the soft skills within themselves and their team members, applying the right level of intensity and encouraging a culture of ownership, teamwork and collaboration. If these things are missing, whether DevOps or another team, the unit will fall apart.

    This is why a DevOps leader needs to take personal ownership and responsibility for the success of their team and see motivating others, setting a standard of operational excellence and representing the DevOps team as an integral part of their role. Luckily, there are resources to learn and exercise these skills so every leader, newly appointed or veteran, can ensure their team can excel.

  • What Amazon’s New CEO Means for IT’s Future

    What Amazon’s New CEO Means for IT’s Future

    Amazon is placing its bets on the future of cloud. The announcement that CEO Jeff Bezos will be stepping down and passing the torch to Amazon Web Services (AWS) leader Andy Jassy at the start of Q3 2021 signals a major shift in the future of technology – and not only for organizations specializing in IT, storage and web hosting. Rather, the growth of AWS signals a multi-industry-wide demand for cloud services as the new normal for conducting business – and those that continue to rely on legacy technologies could soon see their businesses falter in the shadows of competitors in the near future. However, every company’s individual systems are entirely unique, and modernization doesn’t happen with a one-size-fits-all approach. So why should organizations invest in new technologies – and how?

    Setting Sights on the Cloud

    The pandemic has made painfully clear the need for organizations to get away from their aging legacy systems and to embrace the cloud for a variety of reasons. First, COVID-19 has forced almost all businesses, across all industries, to embrace more distributed networks – requiring business-critical systems and functions to be accessed from countless different sources at any given moment. This can prove a major pain point for organizations with IT infrastructures that are prone to difficulties and outages. These shortcomings can have a detrimental impact on customers and citizens, as well. In light of major IT outages in states like New Jersey, California and Oregon, it’s clear that pursuing a more modern approach to IT systems is no longer just an option – it should be the only option. This is because, in addition to the benefits for users and enhanced business function, there are added benefits for the company itself and the world at large.

    Shifting systems away from data centers requires significantly less energy to power – and as data centers are responsible for as much greenhouse gas emissions as the airline industry, the environmental impact coupled with operational cost savings enable businesses to meet customer demands for greener practices while reducing overall operational costs. What’s more, this change to cloud services will allow for horizontal scalability within organizations, ensuring that businesses are able to meet demands for their offerings in real-time.

    The Sky is the Limit: Strategies for Improving IT Infrastructure

    If your organization is relying on a mainframe, it won’t be able to reap the many benefits that cloud infrastructure has to offer – and organizations that shy away from making these vital updates run the risk of running their business offline entirely. As a result, the time to act is now – but in the rush to get IT departments in order, it’s vital that organizations choose a modernization strategy that is best suited to their unique business. For most organizations, a modernization journey begins with one of the four following approaches:

    • System Replacement: Sometimes, organizations aim to expedite their modernization journeys by doing away with their aging legacy systems entirely. Through a system replacement, organizations purchase off-the-shelf solutions from third-party vendors and conduct business via the new software while their existing infrastructure and applications are taken out of service. While this approach enables a speedier shift toward the cloud, it should be noted that these solutions aren’t tailored to a specific company’s needs or functions, and that these solutions can be especially costly.
    • Rewriting: In an effort to retain key legacy knowledge while enabling better business function, some organizations pursue a rewrite of their existing systems within a more modern environment. Through this approach, a team of professional developers work to manually recreate the system and its applications – which often results in an extended timeline for modernization, exorbitant costs and an especially high risk of complete project failure.
    • Automated Refactoring: Through looping in a team of IT experts, this strategy enables an organization to migrate their legacy system’s procedural code bases into object-oriented languages within modern environments that are more appropriate for today’s business demands. Using specialized and automated tools designed for the project at hand, this modernization strategy ensures that an organization has a system designed for its unique business cases and an immediate pathway to the cloud.
    • Rehosting: To help companies maintain their legacy information, many organizations pursue rehosting as part of their modernization strategy. In this approach, a company’s existing legacy codebase is transferred away from their mainframe and their unchanged procedural code bases, data and other core functions into a new computing environment that is more suitable for current needs. This fast-paced process helps to set organizations on track toward the cloud as quickly as possible.

    Aiming for the Cloud(s)

    Amazon’s shift in leadership is a testament to the growth potential and overall importance of the cloud – not only for companies that manage web services, but for all industries around the world. However, by proactively taking the steps to move away from legacy systems and pursue a cloud-first approach to business, organizations will be better positioned to maintain their revenue streams, improve scalability, drive customer satisfaction, reduce operational costs and even protect themselves from potential disasters down the line. By setting and sticking to a set strategy and timeline for modernization, companies can ensure the success of their most mission-critical applications and functions to ensure their continued success and survival in a world or rapidly changing business demands.

    The sky is the limit – are you ready to aim for the cloud(s)?

  • DevOps Chats: Software Delivery Leadership Forum and DevOps World 2020, CloudBees

    DevOps Chats: Software Delivery Leadership Forum and DevOps World 2020, CloudBees

    DevOps World | Jenkins World has long established itself as a leading venue for DevOps practitioners to learn, share their knowledge and build a top-notch community. But, what about leaders, the people in leadership roles at companies who utilize DevOps as a vital part of their business and technology strategies?

    Sam Fell, CloudBees area VP enterprise markets, joins DevOps Chats to discuss the newly announced Software Delivery Leadership Forum. DevOps World 2020 is expanding its focus and content by bringing leaders together with content specifically tailored for business and technology leaders. Accelerated Strategies Group, where Mitch Ashley is CEO, is leading the programming of the DevOps World 2020 Software Delivery Leadership Forum.

    As usual, the streaming audio is immediately below, followed by the transcript of the conversation.

    Transcript

    Mitch Ashley: Hi, everyone, this is Mitch Ashley with devopsy.kinsta.cloud, and you’re listening to another DevOps Chat podcast. Today, I’m joined by Sam Fell, area vice president, enterprise marketing at CloudBees. And we’re talking about, actually, a subject of interest to both of us. It’s the new Software Delivery Leadership Forum, and we’ll get into that.

    Welcome to DevOps Chat, Sam.

    Sam Fell: Thank you, Mitch. Pleasure to be here, as always—great speaking with you.

    Ashley: Absolutely. I always enjoy talking with you. For folks who don’t know you, I know you’ve been in the industry around DevOps for a while. [Laughter] So, a lot of folks know you, but—

    Fell: Are you calling me old? Is that it?

    Ashley: Actually, I didn’t say that. I’ve got the gray hair; you’re still young, so.

    Fell: [Laughter]

    Ashley: Just to introduce yourself, for folks that may not know you.

    Fell: Alright, wonderful. So, I am Sam Fell. I am area vice president at CloudBees, where I’ve been for the past year. We were acquired in, as part of the Electric Cloud acquisition where I ran marketing at Electric Cloud.

    Ashley: Yeah, a lot of folks know Electric Cloud, so probably know you from that as well as CloudBees, of course.

    Fell: Yeah. That’s right.

    Ashley: How long ago did that acquisition happen?

    Fell: That was literally a year ago in May.

    Ashley: Okay.

    Fell: So, we are just a year, really just coming up on a year. So, all the exciting stuff was happening, all the stuff that made me lose my hair and all that was happening right now. And we were just so thrilled with the outcome to be, you know, the company that Electric Cloud was. We had a pretty nice name in the space. But when you look at CloudBees and you look at the community that they’ve created and you look at the access to the brains that they have, it’s a tremendous opportunity. You know, obviously, I’m really excited to be able to be here. And I’m excited about sharing this journey with the Accelerated Strategies Group, right?

    Ashley: Well, thank you. I’m excited about that, too. Yeah, CloudBees is a great organization, as was Electric Cloud.

    So, let’s get into the—we made an announcement, or actually, you did a press release about the Software Delivery Leadership Forum, and there’s a connection to DevOps World and some other things. Maybe we start with that and then we can talk about Accelerated Strategies’ involvement in it.

    Fell: Lovely. Awesome. Okay, so, you know, we’ve been running probably, people would say, the most successful DevOps conference for years now, DevOps World/Jenkins World. Almost 2,000 people show up to learn more about what’s happening in the space, there’s hands on practitioner based workshops and training for people to really get their hands on and get them dirty about how to implement these changes that have to happen as you’re digitally transforming your organization.

    One of the things that we took a step back and we were thinking about is, what we don’t really have is a place for the leadership to be able to participate. And, you know, we’ve done leadership seminars and workshops before, but we’ve never said that DevOps World needs to be a place where not only the practitioners are coming, but where the leaders are coming to learn not the practitioner level information, but how to lead the practitioners. What are the processes, what are the methods that people are learning and using and trying and failing with and learning from?

    And so, we thought we would add that to the program. And as we were thinking about adding it to the program, we also thought, because of the way that the DevOps World/Jenkins World show has evolved, I as a vendor looked back at DevOps World/Jenkins World and I was always very willing to sponsor that event when I was at Electric Cloud, because it was an open event. There was not a ton of bias towards CloudBees products, necessarily. It was really about the community, and it was about educating people.

    And so, in that same spirit, when we were thinking about how do we make sure that there’s some objective independence in the way that we’re putting out the ideas around, “How do you lead? How do you lead this transformation? How do you make sure that your teams are all on the same page?” We felt that it was really helpful to have a third party help us with that programming. And so, that’s, of course, this is the cue to Accelerated Strategies, this is why we sort of reached out to you. There’s obviously great synergy between the work that we’re doing, and we thought, who better to help us craft this program, the programming for this conference than the fine people over at Accelerated Strategies?

    Ashley: Good.

    Fell: So, that’s pretty much where we’re going, and then you and I have had lots of conversations about what that Software Delivery Leadership Forum should look like at the event, and so maybe I would pitch it back to you and you could talk a little bit about what we’re thinking about for DevOps World Software Delivery Leadership Forum.

    Ashley: Absolutely. And thanks so much, we appreciate you approaching us, and it was exciting to work with you on this. And I agree—you know, DevOps World, yes, it’s CloudBees behind it, Jenkins World, but the community that you talk about really elevates it above any one vendor, to use that word.

    Fell: Yeah.

    Ashley: And just the fact that Electric Cloud, you know, would—and many others would sponsor a conference that’s put on by another vendor.

    Fell: Yep, yep, coopetition. The competitors were there and happy about it because the audience is the right audience. These are the people that are in the weeds making it happen with their fingers, and now what we’re saying is, “Hey, these people over in the weeds that are using their fingers, they need other people to help on the top that can help support and pave the road for them.”

    Ashley: They do.

    Fell: And so, we’ve been trying to do that.

    Ashley: Well, and I would imagine, too, that, you know, one of the drivers behind leadership as a topic is organization scale. You know, trying to do DevOps on more than two or three or four independent projects, that’s when you get into the heavy lifting. That’s when you’ve got to have management support. And now I see—I know you do, too—leaders reaching out and trying to find resources for themselves, educate themselves, lessons learned, pitfalls, community that they can be part of as well as the technical folks be part of their community and that’s in large part from what we’ve talked to why to go after this Software Delivery Leadership Forum.

    Fell: That’s right, exactly. Do you wanna talk a little bit about what the proposed format would be at the—

    Ashley: Yeah.

    Fell: —Software Delivery Leadership Forum? Wonderful, okay.

    Ashley: Yeah, I’m happy to. We have some research that we’re gonna be launching, and talking about around software delivery that we’ll be discussing and presenting some of the findings from.

    But the main point of how we’ve crafted this to be, it’s a parallel track. It’s not a separate venue, separate place, it’s just a set of content that’s specifically directed at leaders, people in SE or VP director software leader kind of role, but it’s also product leaders as well as transformational leaders. And those are the folks that we really would like to attract to attend to this, because that combination is always what needs to come together to achieve some business strategy, disruptive strategy product delivery, some kind of financial effect that we’re trying to have on the organization.

    So, it’s a track of about 22 different sessions, but we’re gonna have a number of things that will be highly interactive. So, we’re gonna have some panels, we’ll have some audience participation, kinda open forum for questions and answers with different experts, and we’ll have people that—yes, there’ll be some folks who are product company, there’ll be folks who are analysts like from Accelerated, but not only Accelerated; we’ll have other analysts there. And then, we’d like to have as many practitioners in a business role technical leadership role as well to get that perspective.

    Fell: Right.

    Ashley: And we’ve planned some workshops and some things like that. So, my goal is that everybody take three things away from this conference. Whatever those three things are, come back to your company, to your team, to your organization and say, “You know? I picked up some really good stuff. This one, I had no idea somebody was facing the same issue and they actually solved it—”

    Fell: And they fixed it, right.

    Ashley: “—a way I was thinking about, so it validated our thinking.” Or,  you know, “Threw it out the window and we’ve got a whole other approach, but I’m sure glad I didn’t march down that Bataan death march.” [Laughter]

    Fell: Waste my time—failing fast is winning, exactly.

    Ashley: Exactly, exactly. So, the call for presentations is open right now.

    Fell: Yep.

    Ashley: You can go to DevOpsWorld.com, and there’s a button there that is a call for presentations, fill out information, we’d love to have folks, and we are reviewing submissions actively right now, so it’s a good time to get this out.

    Fell: Yeah. We’re getting—actually, from that release, we’re getting quite a few submissions, which is really nice. There’s some suggestions around some of the topics that we’re looking to have people talk about—governance, security, those are big topics. So, yeah, definitely interesting to get people’s perspectives and to see what they have to say. We’re excited about that.

    Ashley: It is. So, full disclosure, we both have an interest in this and participating, but it’s good to be on with you to talk about it.

    Fell: Yeah, for sure.

    Ashley: You know, I’m curious, too, because you’re doing this—well, let me ask you, why did you decide to name it the Software Delivery Leadership Forum? Because I know we went around a couple names, a couple of ideas.

    Fell: Yeah. So, well, when you think about the work that the fine people are doing, whether they’re doing it from a DevOps perspective or they’re just in dev or they’re just in ops or they’re part of the executive team who’s not part of development or operations, but they have a vested interest in development and operations getting their stuff done, right?

    Every—this is such a hackneyed expression, it’s very overused, but every business is a software business. And now, in this age we find ourselves in, the digital connection with your customers is more important than ever.

    Ashley: Mm-hmm, mm-hmm.

    Fell: And so, there are other people beyond just dev and ops. And so, originally, it was going to be the DevOps Leadership Forum, but it’s really, we think it’s more about that, delivering that software or delivering those services that are foundationally built on top of software, and you can call it whatever you want, but down at the base layer, somebody’s written code, somebody’s built that code, somebody had to deploy it to a server so that people could get any value from it.

    And so, the software delivery life cycle, the SDLC, is something that we think a lot about in the SDLF, like, the Software Delivery Leadership Forum. Because the SDLC is still alive, it’s still kicking, and application life cycle management matters, even in the age of DevOps. And so, we thought that this would be an appropriate name for what we’re trying to put together with you is a place for people, a community to come together that’s built on the community that we already have of all these practitioners who already understand how a lot of this stuff works, but now, they’re just looking for some guidance and some, “Hey, I don’t wanna go down that road again, because that guy already failed,” right? Failing fast and learning from it is not a failure.

    Ashley: Exactly. There’s so much sharing that happens in the technical community, I’m confident we can build that with the business product and technology leadership.

    Fell: Yep.

    Ashley: It’s interesting. We’re in the midst of, maybe we’re still in the early part of this, I don’t know the whole COVID-19 and being in lockdown and, of course, there’s the health and, in some cases, even losing people that we know in our family, or friends. So, in all due respect to that, you know, I’ve talked—some of the things I’ve talked about on another venue, which is TechStrong TV, is, it’s interesting to see this—

    Fell: Congratulations on that launch, by the way.

    Ashley: Thank you. It’s a lot of fun to do.

    Fell: Yeah, I love it. Yeah, that’s great.

    Ashley: It’s a lot of fun to do. Some great content on there. If you haven’t checked it out, go to TechStrong.tv.

    Fell: Yes.

    Ashley: Two to four hours a day, Monday through Friday, so—keep you company. I call it “the view” for technology people. [Laughter]

    Fell: Nice. Very nice.

    Ashley: So, even in this situation, you know, we’re locked down, right? Everybody’s working from home. Most people are. I’ve noted, you know, restaurants have all gone to delivery. They’ve gone to curbside delivery. Even restaurants around here have now started to come up with new offerings to essentially take home packaged meals, kinda like you would from one of those box delivery services.

    And even places like Best Buy has curbside delivery. I had to build a computer, and the delays of shipping something from a manufacturer were so long, you know, and they had to change their apps. They rebuilt their app or added to their app and their web notifications to have, you know, a button to push to say, “I’m in the parking lot and I’m in a white this car and here I am, and by the way, here’s my QR code or scan code,” or not even have to do that.

    Fell: To validate—yeah, exactly.

    Ashley: And that happened in weeks. That wasn’t—you know, that’s a few weeks that those two examples happened. Now think about—

    Fell: Life finds a way. Commerce finds a way, maybe that’s [Cross talk].

    Ashley: It does, it does. And kudos to those folks and many others who were looking for—maybe we didn’t disrupt it, but disruptive business strategies. [Laughter]

    Fell: Yeah. I mean, they have to respond.

    Ashley: Delivery through software.

    Fell: Yeah. They need to respond. Life finds a way, I love it—DevOps finds a way.

    Ashley: It’ll be interesting, I think, you know, given the time frame, the dates are September 21st through the 24th in Las Vegas. And, you know, we’ll have several months behind us, hopefully not too bad, but several months of experience. I bet there is gonna be a lot of stories, many stories of folks who have reacted and responded and some successes, and—

    Fell: Led through that change, right, exactly. Led through that change.

    Ashley: So, talk about a good test—well, not good, but talk about a test situation for the flexibility and agility of our businesses.

    Fell: Yeah. This is the crucible. That’s really the crucible, right here.

    Ashley: Yeah. It truly is.

    Fell: And so, one of the other things, you know, that we’re doing—and Mitch, you’re part of this as well—is that we’re so excited about the Software Delivery Leadership Forum that we actually don’t wanna wait for the September event to get started.

    And so, what we’re actually doing is, we’re creating an online virtual series of Software Delivery Leadership Forums, with our first one coming up at the end of this month in April. Episode one of this series is gonna be on upskilling. It’s on adapting humans at the speed of DevOps and we’re gonna be joined by our friend, Jayne Groll—our mutual friend Jayne Groll—and Eveline Oehrlich, who is her head of research.

    Ashley: Both are mutual friends, yeah.

    Fell: Right, and Eveline—

    Ashley: Both are analysts with Accelerated, too.

    Fell: She’s with you over at Accelerated Strategies, right. And we’ll be joined even further after they’ve given their little talk about the survey results, and we’re actually gonna get an interesting cut of data for the European, because we’re doing two versions of that, event—one for the U.S. time zone friendly and one for EMEA time zone friendly.

    Ashley: Mm-hmm.

    Fell: And so, for the EMEA one, there’s gonna be a different cut of the data that’s gonna be much more focused on that geography, which we’re really excited about. But we’re having a whole bunch of other folks join us as well to be able to have that conversation, because we’re really wanting to try and create, again, a community where there’s interaction between the attendees and the folks who are on the webinar or on this virtual event. Because so many events, people parade out folks that are saying, “Yeah, here’s how we’re successful” and then maybe you get five or 10 minutes at the end for questions and answers.

    And so, we’re kinda gonna flip that on its head and we’re gonna have 30 minutes up front for the Software Delivery Leadership Forum—30 minutes up front for Jayne and Eveline to go through their findings to talk as subject matter experts about this topic that they certainly know a lot about. And at that point, we’re going to introduce a couple of other panelists to join us on camera and start fielding questions directly from the audience.

    And so, the folks who are going to be joining us this time around, we’ve got Ellen Thorne, who is the head of HR here at CloudBees, so who better than a person who’s in HR to talk about what’s—that’s an interesting perspective. What’s unique about that from a—

    Ashley: Skills and training of their people, yeah.

    Fell: Yeah, training. Robert Reeves, who’s the CTO at Datical, right? So, how is the technical person who used to hire technical people, what is that like? What kind of people are you looking for? What skills do you find deficient? What skills do you find lacking that you’d like to see? Of course, you’re joining us.

    And so, really, really excited about that. And then over in Europe, we’ve got a couple of other people joining as well—Eveline Oehrlich will be on that one as well as Cheryl Razzell, who is over at, I think, PolyCom right now, and she used to be at HSBC. She’s not a customer, I think, any more, but she was a customer ad she definitely has an opinion about this.

    So, we’re really looking for people with different perspectives to have a conversation. I’m gonna be on there, you’re gonna be on there. I’ll be moderating, I’m gonna be looking at the chat window the entire time. All the panelists will be able to respond to the questions that are posed in the chat. There’s gonna be a mechanism for people to vote the different answers up or down, which is pretty cool.

    Ashley: Mm-hmm.

    Fell: And my role is really gonna just be to interject and speak on behalf of the people on the chat and say, “Hey, Bill brings up a good point,” “Hey, Debbie just brought up a really good point, she disagrees with you,” “He thinks that that is wrong,” whatever. I’m gonna try and be a conduit to make sure that the audience feels like they’re part of that conversation.

    So, we’re gonna have 30 minutes of up front, set the table subject matter expert speaking stuff, and then we’re gonna have an hour of live Q&A or as long as that audience has questions, we’re gonna work on trying to get to them.

    Ashley: Wow, an hour. That’s great, that’s fantastic. I mean, you know, community in some ways starts with conversation. That’s what draws people in and say, “What’s happening? What are those folks talking about? What is that? Oh, I have a question, I have a thought.” And I’m sure we’ll get some opinions coming in on those questions. [Laughter]

    Fell: That’s right.

    Ashley: Sometimes, they’re sort of written that way, that, “Hey, don’t you think this is true, instead of the way you said it?”

    Fell: Yeah, exactly.

    Ashley: Which is actually, it’s some of the challenge as well as seeking information that helps advance it for all of us, and—you know, there’s more than one way to skin a cat, if you will.

    Fell: I was on a crowd chat with DevOps Institute, I think it was about a week ago, and we had folks from all over the world chiming in and giving their, some prompts that we were asked. It’s fantastic to see people, like you said, to challenge the status quo, to give their opinion of what’s worked for them to understand. Because that—you know, you get an understanding of how some people’s situations are just different. And you can’t—there is no best practice. I think Manuel Pais and Matthew Skelton, they talk about this all the time. There’s no best practice, there’s just lots of good practices—

    Ashley: Good practices.

    Fell: —that you can apply to various different, apply to different areas, but you can’t just say that there is one best practice.

    Ashley: So, kind of a variation on the best practice theme, I’ll just ask you your—neither one of us can predict the future that accurately. [Laughter] But what are your thoughts about this virtual event, virtual conferences? Is that something you think will stay with us in a meaningful form post COVID and whatever, how we’re working, all that environment?

    Fell: I do. You know, you saw O’Reilly has canceled all of their physical conferences.

    Ashley: Yeah, yeah.

    Fell: And so, regardless of what ends up happening, I think the same way that the businesses like Best Buy and the other folks that you talked about are transitioning and they’re shifting.

    Ashley: Mm-hmm.

    Fell: I mean, I’m seeing—this week, I’m starting to see all the activities that my children were involved in are now, they’re finally acquiescing and saying, “Okay, we’re transitioning, and now, here’s the Zoom link for you to join for the kung fu class and you’re just gonna do it in your living room, but you have to still wear all of your things and you still have to show up and be polite.”

    So, they’re also transitioning, and businesses are transitioning. They’re learning how to work more remote. I’m very lucky to be working at a company that’s, you know, we’re 99, 90% remote already, so it’s not a huge change for us, but it is a huge change for the folks that are working remotely in my company who have, now, children at home.

    Ashley: Mm-hmm.

    Fell: And so, education is gonna be impacted and I’m talking with Charlie Betz, who’s an analyst over at Forrester, he’s a teacher over at the University of St. Paul—or St. Thomas, excuse me. And he’s talking, he and I talk all the time about how is education gonna be impacted by this? What are—as a parent, I’m sitting at home and I’m working, but my children are here, and they should be doing some school things, but it’s very hard for me to keep up with that and keep track of it. And I think it’s hard for a lot of the educators, because they haven’t had the experience in the virtual meeting space that we’ve all been sort of used to for a while.

    And so, I think there’s a lot of learning that needs to come out of this, but I see—and one of the things that Charlie says is, when people have no jobs, they can do a couple different things, but one of the things a lot of different people do is they go back to school, which is a fantastic thing to do.

    Ashley: Mm-hmm. Oh, yeah, absolutely.

    Fell: And if you give people viable options to educate themselves and make themselves—again, all about the upskilling conversation that we were just having. How do we enable these people to be able to make sure that they’re gonna stay relevant, and how do we help them get jobs for the folks that are right now, that they don’t have a job because they’re forced to be in an office that’s closed?

    Ashley: Right.

    Fell: So, I think that there will be quite a bit of focus on how do we educate at a distance, how do we make the collaboration work better. And I think it’s happening already naturally. People are getting more accustomed to being on video calls, right? People who used to never want to be on a video call, now they’re flipping on their video, because it’s like—you know what? We’re all in this together, and one of the things that I really appreciate, before we started scheduling this, I ran around to everyone in my house and I said, “Hey, guys, please don’t scream for the next 30 minutes, because I’m gonna be recording something.”

    Ashley: [Laughter]

    Fell: But the fact is, is that I’m on meetings with people and, you know, my kid or my wife will walk by and we’ll speak. And now, it’s—it used to be where I was embarrassed by that, because it was an intrusion into my workday. And sort of the mind shift that I think is happening is that now, what’s happened is that I’m allowing work into my home.

    Ashley: Yep. And you’re entering into other people’s homes at the same time.

    Fell: And I’m also entering—yeah, absolutely, I’m entering into other people’s homes. But I think there’s a much more understanding and a much more—I’m more comfortable, anyways, with there being life happening outside of me. It’s like the classic BBC video of the girl, the 2-year-old girl who runs in the room. He was—he was, like, appalled that that would happen. And now, if that happened, hopefully, he wouldn’t be, right?

    Ashley: It’s called life.

    Fell: So, I think, as an organization—it’s life, right? And hopefully, as a humanity, we’re getting better about that, and I think we will.

    Ashley: You know, to give you some, a little bit of data to back up part of what you were saying is, we’ve launched—we started an IT, health emergency IT preparedness survey back in February, and things happened so fast that just a traditional survey couldn’t keep up with the changes that are happening with work at home and how this has evolved.

    So, we’ve also launched a flash poll survey, and I’ll be talking about it on TechStrong TV this week. But one of the initial ones before we announced this flash poll, one of the initial ones was, “What is the most critical—you’ve only got one choice—between kinds of services that you use to support your work at home staff? There’s e-mail, collaboration services, meeting, file sharing, phone—all kinds of things.

    Fell: And which ones had degradations, yeah.

    Ashley: Well, yeah. And it’s, surprisingly, collaboration and online meeting services were equal. Those are the top two, within 1% of each other.

    Fell: The top two worst performing?

    Ashley: No, this is of our most critical to my business.

    Fell: Most critical—okay, got it.

    Ashley: Supporting it. We’re gonna do another survey on what have you had issues with that’s actually launched this week.

    Fell: Yeah, I just—that’s why I saw it, because I just saw that one. I was like, “What?”

    Ashley: You just saw it. [Laughter] So, 37 and 36%, I think, online meetings was 37. And so—and email was, like, 20. So, that tells me people have already made this shift into Slack and Microsoft Teams and Hangout and Google and whatever other forms they have for kinda their corporate chat.

    So, I think that skill of collaborating that way is something that will be a natural outcome of the situation we’re in.

    Fell: Yeah, I think so. I mean—yeah, hard times force people to think differently.

    Ashley: Mm-hmm.

    Fell: And we’re a very resilient species. We’ve been around for a while, and we’ll figure this out, but it’s terrible to have to go through it.

    Ashley: It is, it is. We just hope everybody gets through okay.

    Fell: Yeah, exactly.

    Ashley: That’s what we’re hoping for. Well, Sam, it’s a great pleasure, a lot of fun, always, to talk with you. Thanks for being on the podcast and for joining us today, sharing and also sharing with Accelerated Strategies the Software Delivery Leadership Forum. Excited to do all of those events with you and take that dialogue to the next level and really build the community amongst the leadership side.

    Fell: Me, too—wonderful. Thank you, Mitch. I appreciate your invitation and stay safe.

    Ashley: You bet. So, you’ve listened to another DevOps Chat podcast. This is Mitch Ashley thanking everyone for joining us today. Be safe, be careful out there.

  • The Leadership Suite DevOps and Business Alignment Success Guide

    The Leadership Suite DevOps and Business Alignment Success Guide

    There’s not much point to DevOps if the business isn’t directly benefiting through increased efficiency, productivity and, hopefully, profitability. This is possible only when IT and DevOps teams are delivering the technology the business actually needs to succeed and compete.

    As IBM director in IBM Cloud writes in his post, “Putting the ‘Biz’ in DevOps“: “The goal in any meaningful DevOps practice is to reduce the time and improve the efficiency in moving from the “Business Need” on the left to the “It’s Live!” on the right.”

    That alignment, while essential, isn’t easy to achieve. As I mentioned previously in my post, “The Big Digital Transformation Trends Through 2017,” the Deloitte 2016 – 2017 Global CIO Survey found that the expectations business has for IT are out of sync when it comes to what IT actually can deliver. The survey found this to be true when it comes to customer focus, technology-enabled business growth and innovation. For example, “even though 57 percent of the CIOs surveyed said that customers were their organization’s top business priority, less than half were involved in delivering customer experience (45 percent) or working on customer acquisition, retention and loyalty (44 percent),” that report found.

    That survey also found, startlingly, that while only 5 percent of organizations say that strategic alignment of IT activities with business strategy is a leading-class capability in their organization, 80 percent of organizations believe such alignment is critical to success.

    With this in mind, we’ve cultivated some of the best stories and other content on devopsy.kinsta.cloud when it comes to effective alignment of DevOps efforts and business strategy.

    The Big Digital Transformation Trends Through 2017

    Some of the most important trends in 2017 will include CIOs struggling to break out of the role of IT plumber and to better align the business with IT.

    How to Align Your DevOps and Cloud Initiatives – devopsy.kinsta.cloud

    One of the best ways to align with the business is to move software more swiftly with continuous delivery efforts. In this post, Michael Schmidt, head of the Automic DevOps Practice, details how to best manage IaaS, PaaS along with DevOps so that organizations can develop more quickly, and rapidly move to continuous delivery.

    The Conundrum of Adopting DevOps within Organizational Constraints

    In this post, devopsy.kinsta.cloud regular contributor JP Morgenthal explains that as with most changes within IT, with DevOps adoption, there is a need for bottom-up support as well as a top-down requirement that provides the coverage, financing, motivation and accountability to the business to enable change to occur.

    Putting the ‘Biz’ in DevOps

    Here, Rick Weaver, director IBM Cloud, explains how by adopting the right business-oriented metrics will help expand DevOps capabilities into a broader, more meaningful “BizDevOps” practices.

    Enterprise DevOps: Organizational Change a Must

    In this article, Sanjeev Sharma, IBM Worldwide lead, details the principles necessary to foster application delivery team alignment from a people and team perspective—something that is essential if teams are to successfully align with DevOps.

    It’s Time to Couple Security, Business Leadership

    In this post, yours truly reviews the importance of aligning security and business leadership, and if organizations conducted themselves that way, there’d be a much smaller gap between security teams and their organization’s board of directors when it came to cybersecurity expectations and reality.

    — George V. Hulme

  • Digital Transformation Strains Traditional IT

    Digital Transformation Strains Traditional IT

    It’s hard to believe, but it’s almost been 13 years since Nicholas G. Carr wrote his famous essay, “IT Doesn’t Matter.” In that column Carr argued that IT had become so pervasive in enterprises and so widely used that it had essentially become a commodity and was no longer useful as a tool for business differentiation.

    “Behind the change in thinking lies a simple assumption: that as IT’s potency and ubiquity have increased, so too has its strategic value. It’s a reasonable assumption, even an intuitive one. But it’s mistaken. What makes a resource truly strategic—what gives it the capacity to be the basis for a sustained competitive advantage—is not ubiquity but scarcity,” Carr wrote.

    If that sentiment was accurate then, and I wasn’t convinced it was at the time, it’s not accurate anymore. Today, how enterprises are building and implementing IT is a clear differentiator when it comes to delivering apps business users and customers need and want, built and designed in ways they want to interact, and delivered in a timely manner.

    According to a recent report published by Salesforce, “2016 State of IT,” IT leaders are focusing on mobile apps, migration to the cloud, as well as building adequate cybersecurity/incident response, customer-facing digital apps and productivity apps. The report found that 68  percent of respondents said that they are increasing their budgets on mobile apps, cloud and security. The lion’s share of respondents also plan to increase their budgets allocated to cybersecurity (63 percent) while 62 percent will spend more on employee productivity apps.

    The report survey, conducted at the end of 2015, is based on responses from 2,255 CIOs and IT leaders from within the United States, Canada, Brazil, Australia, Japan, France, the United Kingdom and Germany. One of the first things to leap out at me from the results is, based on my interviews with many enterprise users, this increased focus on mobile apps and employee productivity apps will certainly be welcome in most enterprises—mobile app backlogs are a problem in many organizations today, as we covered in “Make ‘Mobile First’ an Innovation Strategy,” “Mobile App Development Will Soon Grow More Enterprise-Focused,” and “For More Mobile Wins, Enterprises Must Find their MVPs.”

    As IT leadership had to do in every other transformative period (and cloud, mobile, data analytics are all transformative) such as the displacement of mainframes by PCs in the 1980s, the rise of the local area network and the arrival of the commercial web in the 1990s, IT is at the center of business strategy. CIOs and IT leadership need to make sure they get themselves out in front of these trends and align the services technologies they are delivering with what their users need. According to the report, this need for IT to drive innovation is forcing leadership to rethink their IT organizations. And, as a result, according to the “State of IT” report, to help address this, 60 percent of enterprises now have a relatively new position in the chief digital officer.

    Of course, as this push by enterprises continue, the competition for talent heats up. According to the “State of IT” report, the IT skills demand gap is widening: there just isn’t enough talent to go around. I expect this to grow worse as these enterprise budgets for mobile apps only continue to grow in the years ahead. And one-third of those surveyed in this report said that they are having a painful time keeping skills relevant with emerging trends in cloud, mobile and data analytics. Seventy­-two percent say talent/IT skills development and training will be absolutely critical or very important for their team in the next five to eight years.

    According to this eWeek story, “How the Skills Gap Is Threatening the Growth of App Economy,” while nearly 80 percent of respondents of a CA-sponsored study, “The Battle for Competitive Advantage in the App Economy,” said that becoming a “software-driven enterprise” is a top priority, the biggest challenge they have in realizing that goal is the skills shortage. The top four critical skills in that survey close resemble the findings in the “State of IT” survey: data science, collaboration, DevOps and APIs.

    The research firm Gartner predicts that by the end of 2017 demand for mobile app development services will grow no less than five times faster than the capacity of internal IT organizations’ deliver mobile apps. With steady mobile phone sales continuing to fuel demands for enterprise mobile apps, the result will be, according to Gartner analyst Adrian Leow, that enterprises will have a hard time rapidly developing, deploying and maintaining mobile apps to meet demand because of the scarcity of developers with good mobile coding and development skills.

    “Organizations increasingly find it difficult to be proactive against competitive pressures, which is resulting in their mobile apps becoming tactical, rather than strategic,” Leow said in this statement. “We’re seeing demand for mobile apps outstrip available development capacity, making quick creation of apps even more challenging.”

    IT leaders are also seeing demand outstrip supply of those with skills in IT security and data engineering and data science—and there’s no sign of a letup in any of these disciplines. Considering all of that, and what Carr write 13 years ago, parts of IT may very well have become commodities—especially at the infrastructure layer of the IT stack. Just don’t try and sell that view to anyone trying to clear their mobile app backlogs or get the most value out of their data today. They’re too busy trying to keep up and hopefully innovate a little to have time to listen.

  • It’s Time to Couple Security, Business Leadership

    It’s Time to Couple Security, Business Leadership

    With the RSA Conference next week, the biggest conference of the year when it comes to enterprise security management, now is an ideal time to look at how IT and security leaders keep security efforts aligned with business objectives.

    There’s a reason why attaining adequate and consistent information security is one of the most challenging aspects of technology management today. The business needs to push IT as far as it can to compete. The CIO and business leaders need to provide the applications and access to data to help people be as productive as quickly as they can be, and get the business services and features to market that customers seek. The role of security, however, is to make sure all of this is done in a reasonably and adequately secured fashion.

    This obviously causes a natural friction between the objectives of the business and the needs of the security team.

    When this friction between the business and security isn’t properly managed, a misalignment arises—and it’s costly.

    It means without executive leadership, security efforts can be sidetracked by the business, appropriate budgets aren’t put into place and overall security and governance efforts are weak. And a lack of healthy dialogue between the security leadership and business leadership will leave misconceptions about the level of security in place.

    The Case for Security Leadership

    A few years ago a Global Information Security Survey conducted by CSO online and PricewaterhouseCoopers found that 43 percent of organizations surveyed believed that their organizations where information security “leaders.” However, when screened for common attributes of what might be considered common among information security front-runners, only 5 percent appeared to actually have mature security programs.

    That’s quite a disparity.

    And when we have this much of a disconnect between security and leadership, proactive security investments don’t get funded, there’s no consistent security policy enforced across the organization and executives don’t understand the real types of business technology risks they face.

    Fortunately, that is starting to change. According to PwC’s most recent “Global State of Information Security Survey 2016,” boards are today more involved in security budget, strategy, policy and other aspects of information security management.

    In my interviews with CISOs and CIOs over the years, it’s hard to find anyone who doesn’t agree that security and business alignment requires healthy and open lines of communication. And this is one of the first places nearly everyone recommends enterprises start if they are not aligned.

    Executive leadership is critical when it comes to successfully aligning security and business objectives. This is because information security teams need to make unpopular decisions. They may have to slow down the release of a new service (especially if the only security review came at the end of the development pipeline), require more automated tests or suggest other ways of doing things that may mitigate unnecessary risk.

    But let’s face it, without executive backing, these efforts will get run over by the momentum of the business. Does this mean everything security suggests it should get? Of course not, but that’s where good communication comes in: At least business leaders come to understand how technical risks translate into business risk.

    What is undeniable is that enterprises with security programs that are aligned with their business and the risk appetite of their organization are going to have more successful in their risk management efforts than those who wing these things.

    In an Accenture 2014 report, “The Cyber Security Leap: From Laggard to Leader,” Accenture concluded that “as part of establishing better governance and controls, CISOs should foster a strong working relationship with their boards and create greater visibility into business processes. They need to educate and collaborate to successfully articulate and prioritize business risk, including insider-related risks. The strategy should be continually assessed to evolve with the organization’s posture and get the best use out of resources.” I agree completely. And if more organizations conducted themselves in such a way, there’d be a much smaller gap between security teams and their organization’s board of directors, as well as a tighter separation between security perception and security reality.

  • Successful technology leaders will embrace the citizen developer

    Successful technology leaders will embrace the citizen developer

    There’s just no slowing down the consumerization of IT. The Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) trend itself has created an enterprise market that will hit $266 billion in 2016, according to a recent report by Markets and Markets. Goldman Sachs released a study earlier this year that found the global software-as-a-service market will reach $106 billion in 2016. And a good portion of those software services are being bought outside of the traditional IT department.

    But the consumerization of IT isn’t stopping with BYOD and cloud services. It’s now extending to application development, more specifically, it’s extending to so-called citizen developers – who are any user (and especially not traditional developers) that are building new applications for use in their organization. They are generally using high-level, newer generation language platforms and cloud services to create their apps. And we’re not talking about creating apps for individuals or a small group of workstations in Excel or Microsoft Access. No, users have been creating for those years. We are talking about full-blown enterprise apps.

    All of this is part of the broad Shadow IT trend, which we have written about extensively. Have a look at our post The Growth in Data Center Uses for Shadow IT for a good overview. The research firm Gartner expects, by the end of this year, that roughly 35 percent of IT expenditures will be managed outside traditional IT, within this shadow IT “channel.”

    What does this mean for CIOs and IT leaders? The emergence of the citizen developer has both positive and negative aspects to it, but in the long run there is likely more value to be found effectively managing and encouraging these citizen developers, than there is in fighting them. For instance, the citizen developer is a front line asset when it comes to clearing enterprise application backlogs.

    We’ve covered it many times how much of a challenge enterprises have today when it comes to meeting the demand for applications, especially mobile apps. As covered in Clearing through the app backlog clutter, 85% of enterprises have an app backlog, with about half of those that do find themselves lagging behind 10 to 20 apps.

    When workers, business managers and executives find themselves unable to do their job as effectively as they need or would like and that IT can’t deliver the apps they request, then these citizen developers are more likely to try to build the apps they need on their own. And the numbers of these citizen developers are increasing.

    According to Intuit QuickBase’s State of Citizen Development Report (Intuit QuickBase is a cloud-based workspace that enables the creation of apps), and based on results from attendees (citizen developers or IT pro who worked with citizen developers) at its EMPOWER 2015 user conference 97% of respondents had traditional word processing and spreadsheet skills, 36% had front end web development skills in HTML, CSS, Javascript, and 8% had traditional coding skills in Java, .NET, Ruby, PHP, C++

    Interesting, 75% of respondents in IT said that they develop more than three-fourths of the app and leave the “last mile” to the citizen developer. And, not surprisingly it is the apps they built to get work done (65%), 42% built apps to run the business, while 27% said they build apps targeting customers.

    These citizen developers can go a long way to help clear the application backlog. Per the report, (29%) have seen a 2X or more increase in application development speeds. Over three-quarters or (76%) of respondents cited operational efficiencies as the primary reason for using the platform. And a whopping (62%) of Citizen Developers responded that it takes less than 2 weeks for them to complete an application, on average,” Intuit QuickBase’s John Carlone wrote in this blog.

    However, all isn’t rosy. IT needs to always ensure that all apps are created and used to policy, that regulated data isn’t being used out of an allowable scope for example, and that appropriate security controls – such as access to that data – be enforced.

    So it’s important that IT is always on the lookout for these apps, catalogue and manage them, and when they are not up to policy, enterprise developers and other teams can then work to get them there.